DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Humphrey, 445 So. 2d 1155.

177 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. J.T.S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    [is] ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ().” We have reviewed cases in which the defendants, first time offenders, were convicted of aggravated oral sexual battery or aggravated incest to assist in our determination of whether Defendant’s sentences were excessive.
  • State v. J.T.S. 865 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    [is] ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more | ^appropriate.’ ().” We have reviewed cases in which the defendants, first time offenders, were convicted of aggravated oral sexual battery or aggravated incest to assist in our determination of whether Defendant’s sentences were excessive.
  • State v. Lebreton 859 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence *798 might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. Dabney 848 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Dixon 852 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    [is] ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ().” Thus, the imposition of a thirty-year sentence was not an abuse of discretion.
  • State v. Augillard 853 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Moreover, in State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (), cert.
  • State v. Simmons 848 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence *68 might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. Smith 842 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. Smith 846 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    at 959 () Smith, who was thirty years old, was well aware that the victim was only sixteen years old at the time of the affair.
  • State v. Alvey 839 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: ItiOn appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ “whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (), cert.
  • State v. Foster 834 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. Jefferson 834 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. Moore 827 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Palermo 818 So. 2d 745 La. 2002
    State v. Cook, 95-2748 (La.5/31/96), (), cert.
  • State v. Marcotte 817 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Cottrell 817 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Moreover, in State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad | ¿sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (), cert.
  • State v. Barnes 816 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Moreover, in State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. McBride 807 So. 2d 836 La. 2002
    State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 4 (La.5/31/96), (), cert.
  • State v. Thompson 806 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might liflhave been more appropriate.’” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. Bunley 805 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" *308 State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. Coston 800 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (), ce rt.
  • State v. Washington 793 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence | ?,?might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (), cert.
  • State v. Washington 793 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. Camese 791 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    However, in State v. Soraparu, 97-1027, p. 1 (La.1997), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" *177 State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. Hymes 787 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Allen 794 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (), cert.
  • State v. PM 786 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
  • State v. P.M. 786 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    615 , 136 L.Ed.2d 539 , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: The only relevant question on review, however, was “whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.” (La.
  • State v. Harris 787 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (), cert.
  • State v. Boudreaux 782 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    On appellate review of sentence, the relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. Robichaux 788 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. Algere 780 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: |7On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (), cert.
  • State v. Rodriguez 781 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: *649 On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. Martin 788 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. McBride 773 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Quest 772 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    Battie, 735 So.2d at 855 .
  • State v. Hall 775 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. Guy 775 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. Mims 769 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. Dank 764 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. Monette 758 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ( (La.
  • State v. Lindsey 758 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 7/26/95); , vacated in part on other grounds, 95-2166 (La.1/26/96); , -60 (La.1984).
  • STATE of Louisiana v. MORRISON 758 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    In reviewing a sentence, we must be mindful that “[t]he only relevant question on review, however, [is] ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96); , 959
  • State v. Morrison 758 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    In reviewing a sentence, we must be mindful that "[t]he only relevant question on review, however, [is] `whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96); , 959
  • State v. Hollins 742 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    State v. Hayden, 97-1070 (La.
  • State v. Brooks 758 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 7/26/95), , vacated in part on other grounds, 95-2166 (La.1/26/96), , -60 (La.
  • State v. Labran 737 So. 2d 903 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    Id., p. 4, at 527, 659 So.2d at 529 ().
  • State v. Thomas 719 So. 2d 49 La. 1998
    On appellate review of sentence, the relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (), cert.
  • State v. Hardaway 715 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Robertson 712 So. 2d 8 La. 1998