Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Celestine, 452 So. 2d 676.
- State v. Harris 627 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
- State v. Gaines 633 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- State v. Evins 626 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
- State v. Cutwright 626 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
- State v. Smith 600 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- State v. Davis 596 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
- State v. Christy 593 So. 2d 1322 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- State v. Kelly 576 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- State v. Lewis 557 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
- State v. Smith 557 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- State v. Gray 556 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
-
State v. Higginbotham
554 So. 2d 1308
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
the Louisiana Supreme Court found that there is no prejudicial effect from the joinder of two or more offenses when the evidence of each offense is relatively simple and distinct, although such evidence might not have been admissible in separate trials of the offenses because, with a proper charge, the jury
-
State v. Driggers
554 So. 2d 720
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
wherein the same principle was applied in the context of joinder of two counts of aggravated rape.
- State v. Hunter 551 So. 2d 1381 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
- State v. Thompson 544 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
- State v. Schneider 542 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
- State v. Brooks 541 So. 2d 801 La. 1989
- State v. Cade 539 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
- State v. Worthy 532 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Baker 535 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
- State v. Stevens 522 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
- State v. Howard 505 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
- State v. Brown 504 So. 2d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. Labuzan 480 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
- State v. McGary 479 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
-
State v. Mims
478 So. 2d 685
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
: Such a motion is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and the court's ruling should not be disturbed on appeal absent a showing of abuse of discretion.
-
State v. Hoffer
469 So. 2d 33
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); cert.
- State v. Johnson 464 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. Williams 464 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. Sterling 462 So. 2d 290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Horton 458 So. 2d 445 La. 1984