Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Flowers, 441 So. 2d 707.
- State v. Weiland 505 So. 2d 702 La. 1987
- State v. Turner 500 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- State v. Bates 495 So. 2d 1262 La. 1986
-
State v. Smith
489 So. 2d 966
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
1391 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 (1979)
-
State v. Lowenfield
495 So. 2d 1245
La. 1986
One, involved the *1261 robbery and aggravated rape of a seventy year old woman.
- State v. Byrne 483 So. 2d 564 La. 1986
- State v. Jones 474 So. 2d 919 La. 1985
-
State v. Burns
471 So. 2d 949
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
discussed the relation of anonymous tips to investigatory stops.
- State v. Wilson 467 So. 2d 503 La. 1985
-
State v. Fraser
471 So. 2d 769
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Belton, 441 So.2d at 1198
-
State v. David
468 So. 2d 1133
La. 1985
in response to argument that it was wrong for the trial judge to instruct the jury on admittedly extraneous aggravating circumstances, we found non-meritorious the claim that the judge should instruct the jury only as to the aggravating circumstances supported by the evidence at trial.
- State v. Walters 464 So. 2d 1052 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. Busby 464 So. 2d 262 La. 1985
- State v. Lee 462 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- State v. Wyatt 462 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Daley 459 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
-
State v. Schreiber
457 So. 2d 218
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
the court, in a unanimous decision, discusses the problem of determining a valid investigatory stop and suggests a mode of analysis applicable to such an inquiry: The Court uses a three-tiered test: (a) Whether an intrusion was an arrest or an investigatory stop.
- State v. Summit 454 So. 2d 1100 La. 1984