Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Davis, 449 So. 2d 466.

38 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Joseph Taylor 217 So. 3d 283 La. 2016
State v. Blank 192 So. 3d 93 La. 2016
State v. Porter 185 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Moody 178 So. 3d 1031 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
and State v. Mills, 2000-2525 (La.App.
State v. Thompson 163 So. 3d 139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Lawrence 47 So. 3d 1003 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Chrishon M. Archield La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
It is sufficient if the evidence is clear and convincing.” -68 (La.1984)(citation omitted).
State v. ARCHIELD 34 So. 3d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
It is sufficient if the evidence is clear and convincing.” -68 (La.1984) (citation omitted).
State v. Johnson 2 So. 3d 606 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
and State v. Mills, 2000-2525 (La.App.
State v. Crandell 987 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Gullette 975 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Parker 963 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
State of Louisiana v. W.D.F., Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
art. 404(B)(1) must be at issue, but it must have some independent relevance, or be an element of the crime charged in order for evidence of other acts to be admissible.5 for the proposition that the commission of another crime must be proven by clear and convincing evidence.
State v. Williams 950 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Merritt 877 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Richard 807 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Mills 806 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Noil 807 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Gibson 785 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Dickerson 772 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Black 757 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Hills 737 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
art. 1103 provided: Article 404(B) and 104(A) neither codifies nor affects the law of other crimes evidence, and their progeny, as regards the notice requirement and the clear and convincing evidence standard in regard to other crimes evidence.
State v. McArthur 719 So. 2d 1037 La. 1998
State v. Miller 718 So. 2d 960 La. 1998
State v. Winn 705 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
LSA-C.E.art.1103 [footnote omitted].
State v. Powell 683 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Williams 672 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Sterling 670 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Scales 655 So. 2d 1326 La. 1995
Prieur, 277 So.2d at 129 .
State v. Ham 652 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
art. 1103: "Article 404(B) and 104(A) neither codifies nor affects the law of other crimes evidence, and their progeny, as regards the notice requirement and the clear and convincing evidence standard in regard to other crimes evidence.
State v. Broussard 649 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
"Article 404(B) and 104(A) neither codifies nor affects the law of other crimes evidence, and their progeny, as regards the notice requirement and the clear and convincing evidence standard in regard to other crimes evidence.
State v. Jackson 625 So. 2d 146 La. 1993
State v. Carr 620 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Griffin 618 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
This article neither codifies nor affects the law of other crimes evidence, and their progeny.
State v. Plater 606 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Tucker 602 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
art. 1103 further provides with respect to the admissibility of other crimes evidence as follows: Article 404(B) and 104(A) neither codifies nor affects the law of other crimes evidence, and their progeny, as regards the notice requirement and the clear and convincing evidence standard in regard to other crimes evidence.