Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Knapper, 458 So. 2d 1284.

17 citing documents.

State v. Allen 913 So. 2d 788 La. 2005
State v. Wessinger 736 So. 2d 162 La. 1999
Knapper v. Connick 681 So. 2d 944 La. 1996
Knapper v. Connick 668 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Davis 626 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Knapper 579 So. 2d 956 La. 1991
State v. Guy 575 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
[the contemporaneous objection rule is designed to inform the trial court of the basis for the objection and to provide it with the opportunity to rule properly, thereby avoiding possible reversal on appeal or the neccessity of a new trial]; , 1287 n. 3 (La.
State v. Jenkins 540 So. 2d 1037 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Howard 533 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Owens 521 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
appears the following: La.R.S.
State v. Grant 517 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Carmouche 508 So. 2d 792 La. 1987
State v. Garmouche 508 So. 2d 792 La. 1987
State v. Cathey 493 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Smith 489 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
1984), the supreme court ruled the article was applicable to statements made to traveling companions; to statements made to co-perpetrators of crimes, to statements made to the mother of a juvenile victim.
State v. Lopez 484 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Hookfin 476 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985