Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Edwards, 430 So. 2d 60.

40 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Julieanne Perales A/K/A Julianne Perales La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. David Brown La. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Timothy H. Queen -Aka- Timothy Hugh Queen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
1173, 55 L.Ed.2d 426 (1978)); -88 (La.1982).
State v. Queen 237 So. 3d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1173 , 55 L.Ed.2d 426 (1978) ); , 62 (La.1983) ; , 687-88 (La.1982).
State of Louisiana v. Terry James Goodeaux -Aka- Terry Goodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
(quoting Holloway v. Arkansas [435 U.S. 475, 98 S.Ct.
State v. Kelly 164 So. 3d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
231 , 121 L.Ed.2d 167 (1992); , 797 (La.1987); -63 (La.
State v. Carter 84 So. 3d 499 La. 2012
1173 , 55 L.Ed.2d 426 (1978); -63 (La.1983); -88 (La.1982).
State v. Barthelemy 32 So. 3d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
1173 , 55 L.Ed.2d 426 (1978)); -88 (La.
State of Louisiana v. A. S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
1173, 55 L.Ed.2d 426 (1978)); -88 (La.1982).
State v. A.S. 24 So. 3d 1009 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1173 , 55 L.Ed.2d 426 (1978)); -88 (La.1982).
State v. As 24 So. 3d 1009 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
1173 , 55 L.Ed.2d 426 (1978)); -88 (La.1982).
State in the Interest of D. A. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
1173, 55 L.Ed.2d 426 (1978)); -88 (La.1982).
State ex rel. D. A. 995 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
1173 , 55 L.Ed.2d 426 (1978)); -88 (La.1982).
State Ex Rel. Da 995 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
1173 , 55 L.Ed.2d 426 (1978)); -88 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Johnny Lee Bell, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
1173, 55 L.Ed.2d 426 (1978)); -88 (La.1982).
State v. Bell 896 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
1173 , 55 L.Ed.2d 426 (1978)); -88 (La.1982).
State of Louisiana v. Jason M. Reeves La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
(quoting Holloway v. Arkansas [, 435 U.S. 475, 98 S.Ct.
State v. Reeves 890 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
(quoting Holloway v. Arkansas [, 435 U.S. 475 , 98 S.Ct.
State v. Cisco 861 So. 2d 118 La. 2003
1173 , 55 L.Ed.2d 426 (1978)); -88 (La.1982).
State v. Odle 834 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
When a defendant raises the issue of a conflict of interest prior to trial, the trial court "is required `either to appoint separate counsel or to take adequate steps to ascertain whether the risk [of a conflict of interest] was too remote to warrant separate counsel.'" quoting Holloway v. Arkansas, 435 U.S. 475, 484 , 98 S.Ct.
State v. Holmes 791 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
468 , 74 L.Ed.2d 617 (1982); (La.App.
State v. McGee 758 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
1708 , 64 L.Ed.2d 333 (1980)
State v. McGee 757 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
this court summarized the law applicable to claims that dual or multiple representation resulted in the ineffective assistance of counsel: The relationship between joint representation and ineffective assistance of counsel has been thoroughly examined by the United States Supreme Court in its opinions r
State v. Lemon 698 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Addison 684 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
1708 , 64 L.Ed.2d 333 (1980)
State v. Tart 672 So. 2d 116 La. 1996
1708 , 64 L.Ed.2d 333 (1980)
State v. Castaneda 658 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Hughes 653 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Mason, supra at 1323 ().
State v. Wille 595 So. 2d 1149 La. 1992
1708 , *1153 64 L.Ed.2d 333 (1980)
State v. Mason 591 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
the court reviewed the principles emanating from decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court governing claims of ineffective counsel arising out of joint representation of clients by a single counsel.
State v. Wille 559 So. 2d 1321 La. 1990
State v. Johnson 553 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Kanupp 552 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Chavez 540 So. 2d 992 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Seay 521 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Carmouche 508 So. 2d 792 La. 1987
this court summarized the law applicable to claims that dual or multiple representation resulted in the ineffective assistance of counsel: The relationship between joint representation and ineffective assistance of counsel has been thoroughly examined by the United States Supreme Court in its opinions rende
State v. Garmouche 508 So. 2d 792 La. 1987
this court summarized the law applicable to claims that dual or multiple representation resulted in the ineffective assistance of counsel: The relationship between joint representation and ineffective assistance of counsel has been thoroughly examined by the United States Supreme Court in its opinions rende
State v. Taylor 449 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Morrow 440 So. 2d 98 La. 1983
State v. Kahey 436 So. 2d 475 La. 1983