Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 447 So. 2d 565.

14 citing documents.

State v. Thomas 928 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Burton 615 So. 2d 1042 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Davis 568 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Duncan 563 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
App. 1st Cir.1988), writ denied, (La.App.
State v. Collins 546 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Swan 544 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Williams 536 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Johnson 529 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Creel 525 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Dean 528 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Harris 510 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Wagster 489 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
In brief, the defendant argues that, in order to introduce the rap sheet into evidence, it was necessary to prove that the document was admissible under the business records exception to the hearsay rule, (La.
State v. Cottingin 476 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Whalen 470 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985