Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Heath, 447 So. 2d 570.

32 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus John Spears La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
1982)); to what extent the expert analysis is controverted by other expert analysis (See, (La.
State v. Gregoire 143 So. 3d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Victorian 25 So. 3d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 2nd Cir. 4/30/08), ; (La.
State of Louisiana v. Malcolm James Simon AKA Malcolm Simon AKA Malcolm J. Simon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Calvert 986 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
App. 1st Cir. 1990); (La.
State of Louisiana v. Wade C. Griffin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Griffin 940 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Wegmann 734 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Parfait 693 So. 2d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Carrier 670 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Franklin 648 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
dant could not discern between right and wrong at the time of the crime ( State v. Claibon, 395 So.2d at 774 ), to what extent the expert testimony was premised on the self-serving revelations of the defendant ( ), to what extent the expert analysis is controverted by other expert analysis ( (La.App.
State v. Bibb 626 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
ant could not discern between right and wrong at the time of the crime ( State v. Claibon , 395 So.2d at 774 ), to what extent the expert testimony was premised on the self-serving revelations of the defendant ( ), to what extent the expert analysis is controverted by other expert analysis ( , (La.App.
State v. Corley 617 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Mickey 604 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Jones 593 So. 2d 1301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Wooden 572 So. 2d 1156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Butler 563 So. 2d 976 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Jackson 548 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
State v. Bell 543 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Volquardts 540 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
1st Cir. 1987); (La.App.
State v. Hahn 526 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
1st Cir. 1983); (La.App.
State v. Pravata 522 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Tarver 521 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Lee 510 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Hilburn 512 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Tuggle 504 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Thomas 504 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Darby 502 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Mills 492 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Martin 491 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Maillian 464 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Heath 448 So. 2d 1302 La. 1984

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by