Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rougeau v. Commercial Union Ins. Co., 432 So. 2d 1162.

64 citing documents.

Scott Wesley Eastman, Et Ux. v. State Farm Mutual La. 2024
Tommy Dubois, Et Ux. v. Gordon Armstrong La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Dubois v. Armstrong 186 So. 3d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Torrejon v. Mobil Oil Co. 876 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Junot v. Morgan 818 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
art. 103 A. [1] -1167 (La.
Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc. 772 So. 2d 94 La. 2000
Kreher v. Semreh Club 694 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Langlinais v. Figueroa 636 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
3d Cir.), writ denied (La.App.
Deville v. Federal Savings Bank of Evangeline Parish 620 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Rougeau v. Commercial Union Insurance Compa *436 ny, (La.App.
Fisher v. Clarkson 613 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
3rd Cir.1986), writ denied, (La.App.
Guillory v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. 604 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Interest from date of judicial demand on the 50% percent.” (La.App.
Clayton v. State Dept. of Transp. & Development 599 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
3d Cir.), writ denied (La.App.
Dent v. Perkins 598 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Page v. Gilbert 598 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Williams v. Jefferson 586 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Romero v. Emerson Elec. Co. 583 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Higley v. Kramer 581 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
art. 1811 indicate that section F, which provides expressly that the JNOV may be granted on the issue of liability or damages, or both, (La.App.
Wheat v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 583 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Johnson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company 575 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Brantley v. General Motors Corp. 573 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Seals v. Gosey 565 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Valley Elec. Membership Corp. 558 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
On the other hand, if there is substantial evidence opposed to the motions, that is, evidence of such quality and weight that reasonable and fair-minded men in the exercise of impartial judgment might reach different conclusions, the motions should be denied, and the case submitted to the jury.'" (La.
Mallett v. State Farm Insurance Co. 553 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
3d Cir.), writ denied, (La.App.
Hollier v. Lay Down Service, Inc. 554 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Duhon v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. 554 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Perschall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 553 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
In applying this standard, the court does not weigh the evidence, pass on the credibility of the witnesses, or substitute its factual judgment for the jury’ (La.App.
Cupstid v. Harrison Hardwood Mfg. Co. 552 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Landry Parish Police Jury, writ denied, (La.
Lopez v. Chicago Bridge and Iron Co. 546 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Marcantel v. Breaux 544 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Jones v. Northbrook Ins. Co. 544 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Acosta v. Pendleton Memorial Methodist Hosp. 545 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Warner v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. 543 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Doming v. K-Mart Corp. 540 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Egan v. Hullinghorst Industries, Inc. 537 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Roger v. Cancienne 538 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Streeter v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., Inc. 533 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
App. 3d Cir.), writ denied, (La.App.
Miller v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. 527 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Miller maintains: (1) (La.App.
Jinks v. Wright 520 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
3d Cir.), writ denied, writ denied
Silliker v. St. Landry Police Jury 520 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
3rd Cir.1986), writ denied, (La.App.
Webb v. Goodley 512 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
3d Cir.), writ denied, (La.App.
West v. Melancon 507 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Hardin v. Munchies Food Store 510 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Pellegran v. Sherman 509 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Patterson v. State, Dept. of Transportation & Development 509 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Bellard v. CNA Ins. Co. 503 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Hammer v. City of Lafayette 502 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Alumbaugh v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. 492 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Palermo v. Lusignan 482 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
The order of an additur or remittitur is therefor contingent; if the party does not agree to the change, he elects to submit to a new trial.” (La.
Whitney National Bank of New Orleans v. Smith 482 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Fernandez v. General Motors Corp. 478 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
See Rougeau v. Commercial Union Ins., Co., (La.App.