Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Faustina Pipe Line Co. v. Broussard, 450 So. 2d 17.
- Burdin v. Board of Com'rs for Atchafalaya Basin Levee Dist. 533 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
- State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Willoughby 520 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- Louisiana Resources Co. v. Noel 499 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
- STATE, DEPT. OF TRANS. & DEVELOPMENT v. Jacob 491 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
- Michigan Wisconsin Pipeline Co. v. Hebert 488 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
-
Jungeblut v. PARISH OF JEFFERSON, CITY OF KENNER
485 So. 2d 974
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
The analysis in Ransome was followed in another expropriation case, (La.
- Southwestern Elec. Power Co. v. Scurlock 485 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
- Vaughan v. Ins. Co. of North America 482 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
- Rester v. Gravity Drainage Board No. II 473 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
-
Faustina Pipe Line Co. v. Hebert
469 So. 2d 483
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
150 , (1964); -85 (La.App.3d Cir.1984), writ denied, writ denied
- Ealy v. Bill Allen Dodge, Inc. 466 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
- Faustina Pipe Line Co. v. Broussard 452 So. 2d 172 La. 1984
- Faustina Pipe Line Co. v. Broussard 450 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984