Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Moreau v. Moreau, 457 So. 2d 1285.
-
Vickie Ardoin Elliott v. Karl Wayne Elliott
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
3 Cir.), writ denied, for the proposition that a plaintiff is not precluded from seeking “a supplemental partition of an omitted asset which was never considered by the parties at the time of the original agreement.” (La.App.
-
Delaney v. McCoy
93 So. 3d 845
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Sullivan v. Sullivan, supra; Mire v. Mire, supra; Goodwyne v. Goodwyne, 94-0079 (La.App.4th Cir.6/30/94), , writ denied, 94-2035 (La.11/4/94)
- Chad Anthony Mire v. Lacinda Michelle Stewart Mire La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Mire v. Mire 962 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Paige B. Sullivan v. Charles P. Sullivan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- Sullivan v. Sullivan 892 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- Day v. Day 858 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- Edwards v. Edwards 817 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- Gautney v. Gautney 814 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
-
Allen v. Allen
787 So. 2d 1226
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
3 Cir. 2/28/01) , ; (La.App.
- Corley v. Baden 781 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
- Robinson v. Robinson 778 So. 2d 1105 La. 2001
- Faucheux v. Faucheux 706 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
-
Brignac v. Brignac
698 So. 2d 953
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
In rejecting Mr. Brignac's transaction or compromise argument, (La.App.
- Sherrill v. Sherrill 639 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
- Distinguished Herrington v. Skinner 640 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
- Blackwell v. Blackwell 606 So. 2d 1355 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- Larsen v. Larsen 583 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- Hare v. Hodgins 567 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
- Rollison v. Rollison 541 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- Johnson v. Johnson 532 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- Anderson v. Anderson 520 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
- Lamartiniere v. Lamartiniere 520 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
-
Little v. Little
513 So. 2d 464
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
2115 , 85 L.Ed.2d 479 (1985); (La.App.
-
Distinguished
Chrisman v. Chrisman
487 So. 2d 140
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
That act recognized the community status of military retirement benefits in those states where applicable, but subject to certain restrictions, i.e. disposable portion, (La.App.
-
Russell v. Russell
465 So. 2d 181
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
1408 became effective, as previously stated, it is evident that appellee is clearly entitled to an interest in said payments as a matter of law," (footnotes omitted) (La.App.
- Menard v. Menard 460 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984