Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Levy v. Billeaud, 443 So. 2d 539.

20 citing documents.

  • Pattridge v. Starks 149 So. 3d 820 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • Hayward v. Hayward 5 So. 3d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Robert Duncan v. Moreno Energy, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    10/17/03), for the proposition that they can sue Defendants directly, rather than via 5 a derivative action on behalf of the corporation.
  • Duncan v. Moreno Energy, Inc. 1 So. 3d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 5/28/03) , , writ denied, 03-1838 (La.10/17/03), , for the proposition that they can sue Defendants directly, rather than via |fia derivative action on behalf of the corporation.
  • In re Reinstatement of Venture Associates, Inc. of Louisiana 906 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    12:145 C; Islander, 715 So.2d at 11-12
  • Yuspeh v. Koch 840 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • Harris v. Federal Fibre Mills Condominium Ass'n 843 So. 2d 457 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    the Supreme Court held a corporate liquidator stands in a fiduciary relationship with the corporation and its shareholders and must adhere to the fiduciary duty standard applicable to officers and directors of business corporations set forth in La.
  • In re Islander Shipholding, Inc. 715 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    |6“It is the duty of a corporation’s liquidator to wind up the corporation’s affairs by assembling its assets, paying its debts and the expenses of liquidation, terminating its litigation by prosecuting, defending, or compromising suits, and paying any surplus to the shareholders according to their respective rights and preferences.”
  • CHURCH POINT WHOLESALE BEVERAGE CO. v. Voitier 706 So. 2d 1015 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • Lawly Brooke Burns Trust v. RKR, INC. 691 So. 2d 1349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • Olinde v. 400 GROUP 686 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    Crescent City Brewing Co. v. Flanner, 44 La.Ann.
  • Succession of Mydland 653 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • JW Warren & Associates v. Audubon Ins. 638 So. 2d 1241 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • Mary v. Lupin Foundation 609 So. 2d 184 La. 1992
  • Spruiell v. Ludwig 568 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
    art. 3499; Plaquemines Par.
  • Terry v. Terry 565 So. 2d 997 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • Williams v. Edward D. Jones & Co. 556 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    Art. 3499; Plaquemines Parish Commission Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc.
  • Landry v. Thibaut 523 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    Before the Wilson case, supra, Louisiana courts recognized the right of a shareholder to sue individually for breach of fiduciary duty in liquidation proceedings, where the fiduciary duty of a corporate officer or director was vested in the liquidator.
  • McMillan v. Bank of the South 514 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    Finally, plaintiffs contend, “The trial court erred in not requiring defendants/appellants, as fiduciaries, to prove good faith of the fiction of the merger but also to show its eminent fairness to the minority shareholders.” for the proposition that they adequately alleged the unfairness of the transaction, thereby placing the burden on defendants of proving their good faith.
  • Great American Insurance Co. v. Miller 508 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    LRS 12:145(C), (F); Drenning v. Kuebel, Inc.