Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc., 454 So. 2d 1081.

100 citing documents.

South Cent. Bell v. Ka-Jon Food Stores 644 So. 2d 357 La. 1994
Co., supra ; Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co., supra ; Smith v. Matthews, supra ; Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc., Pareti v. Sentry Indemnity Co., supra ; Rodriguez v. Northwestern Nat.
Reynolds v. Select Properties, Ltd. 634 So. 2d 1180 La. 1994
See, e.g., Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc., Thomas W. Hooley & Sons v. Zurich Gen.
Rivnor Properties v. Herbert O'Donnell, Inc. 633 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
However, after Todd, the Louisiana Supreme Court decided Borden v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc., which originally held that, where injury or destruction of property is not covered by a policy of insurance, the resulting loss of use of that property is not covered unless otherwise stipulated.
Yount v. Maisano 627 So. 2d 148 La. 1993
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc., LeJeune v. Allstate Ins.
Reynolds v. Select Properties, Ltd. 616 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Company, Inc.
Shaw v. Bourn 615 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc., LeJeune v. Allstate Ins.
Piper v. Gahagon 599 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc., (La.App.
Great American Ins. Co. v. Gaspard 594 So. 2d 981 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Breland, supra ; Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc.
Scamardo v. New Orleans Stevedoring Co. 595 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Borden Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc.
Gonzales v. Bordelon 595 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Borden Inc. v. Howard Trucking Company, Inc., (La.App.
Bergman v. NICHOLSON MGT. & CONSULTANTS 594 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Id.; Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc.
Legier v. Saacks 590 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc.
Haney v. Francewar 588 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc.
Kahn v. Dufrene 587 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Hallar Enterprises, Inc. v. Hartman 583 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Therefore, in accordance with Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Company, Inc., property damage, within the meaning of the exclusionary clauses, only included damage to tangible property and not consequential damages such as loss of use.
Perez v. State, Through DOTD 578 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Company, Inc., (La.
Doe v. Smith 573 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Company, Inc.
Unique Const. Co., Inc. v. SS Mini Storage, Inc. 570 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc., (La.
Dauthier v. Pointe Coupee Wood Treating Inc. 560 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Borden Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc.
Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 558 So. 2d 1106 La. 1990
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc.
Williamson v. Historic Hurstville Ass'n 556 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Borden v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc.
Vizinat v. Transcontinental Gas Pipeline 552 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
As the Louisiana Supreme Court stated in Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc., : "On the other hand, in a suit for damages, it is the plaintiff's burden to prove the damage he suffered as a result of defendant's fault, and to support an award there must be evidence in the record.
Breland v. Schilling 550 So. 2d 609 La. 1989
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc., LeJeune v. Allstate Ins.
Dietrich v. Travelers Ins. Co. 551 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
See Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Company, Inc.
Tesvich v. 3-A's Towing Co. 547 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc., on rehearing.
Jarreau v. Louisiana Stallions 546 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc., Insurance Company of North America v. [Solari] Parking, Inc., Creduer v. Larke [Luke], Glass Services Unlimited v. Modular Quarters, Inc., (La.App.
Kitchens v. Brown 545 So. 2d 1310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Borden, ( on rehearing ).
Fidelity Bank and Trust Co. v. Hammons 540 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
See Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Company, Inc., on rehearing
Alarcon v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. 538 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
In an earlier case, Borden, on rehearing the court said: There is a general rule that a party can incur liability in tort, notwithstanding a contractual relationship between parties, for consequential damages (here, loss of use) where the act causing the damage constitutes both a breach of contract and legal fault.
Brannan v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc. 526 So. 2d 1101 La. 1988
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc. (La.
Wong v. East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff's Office 522 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
See, for example, Borden, Kraaz v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc.
Tide Craft, Inc. v. Red Ball Oxygen Co. 514 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc.
Womack v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 508 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc., Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
New Orleans v. United Gas Pipe Line Co. 517 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
The record demonstrates that United's acts, abetted if not controlled by Pennzoil, damaged LP & L. LP & L cites (among other cases) Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc., for the rule that "a party can incur liability in tort, notwithstanding a contractual relationship ...
Jenks v. State 507 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc.
Morgan v. American Fire and Indem. Co. 506 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Foster v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 504 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Compare Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc., (La.
McFarland v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc. 502 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc., (La.App.
Blair v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 502 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
3rd Cir.1985); Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc., ).
Hayden v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America 500 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc., (La.
Boyd v. Farmers-Merchants Bank & Trust Co. 493 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc.
Weill Const. Co., Inc. v. Thibodeaux 491 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
art. 1999; Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc.
Hastings v. International Service Ins. Co. 490 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Borden Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc.
Moore v. Lindeman 488 So. 2d 1300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
4th Cir.1968), and Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking, Inc.
Batiste v. Joyce's Supermarket 488 So. 2d 1318 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc., Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Great Am. Surplus Lines Ins. Co. v. Bass 486 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc.
Meyers v. Smith 482 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
The often stated rule as to loss of future profits is that they must be proved with reasonable certainty, Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc.
Bourque v. Gulf Marine Transp., Inc. 480 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc., (La.
Smith v. First Nat. Bank of DeRidder 478 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Watson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 459 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
1st Cir.1983), aff'd, (on rehearing).