DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite John Bailey Contr. v. St., Dept. of Tr. & Dev., 439 So. 2d 1055.

53 citing documents.

  • Billy Ray Hodge v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, XYZ Insurance Company, Nicolas Hopkins La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
  • Superior Trucking, LLC v. Sasol Chemicals, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    As recognized in John Bailey Contractor, a requirement for recovery under the theory of detrimental reliance is that the party seeking recovery must have had a justifiable reliance in the representation.
  • Mayehaul Trucking, LLC v. Sasol Chemicals LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    As recognized in John Bailey Contractor, a requirement for recovery under the theory of detrimental reliance is that the party seeking recovery must have had a justifiable reliance in the representation.
  • Leblanc v. Thibodeaux 256 So. 3d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    As recognized in John Bailey Contractor, Inc. v. State Through DOTD , a requirement for recovery under the theory of detrimental reliance is that the party seeking recovery must have had a justifiable reliance in the representation.
  • Randy Leblanc v. Fred Alan Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    As recognized in John Bailey Contractor, a requirement for recovery under the theory of detrimental reliance is that the party seeking recovery must have had a justifiable reliance in the representation.
  • 429 Bourbon Street, LLC v. RMDR Investments, Inc. 230 So. 3d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    & Dev., (quoting American Bank and Trust Company v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company, 251 La.
  • Clovelly Oil Co. v. Midstates Petroleum Co. 112 So. 3d 187 La. 2013
    John Bailey Contractor, Inc. v. State, DOTD, (internal citations removed)(italics in original).
  • MB Industries, LLC v. CNA Insurance Co. 74 So. 3d 1173 La. 2011
    ng “the voluntary conduct of a party whereby he is precluded from asserting rights against another who has justifiably relied upon such conduct and changed his position so that he will suffer injury if the former is allowed to repudiate the conduct.” Morris v. Friedman, 94-2808 (La.11/27/95), (quoting John Bailey Contractor, Inc. v. State, Dept. of Transportation and Development, and American Bank and Trust Co. v. Trinity Universal Ins.
  • In re Ourso 938 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • Gross v. Pieno 892 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • Blanchard v. ABC Ins. Co. 867 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
  • Hibernia Nat. Bank v. Antonini 862 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    John Bailey Contractor, Inc. v. State, Through Department of Transportation and Development, Orr v. Bancroft Bag, Inc., 29,046 (La.App.2d Cir.1/22/97), ; Knight v. State, 30,902 (La.
  • Murphy v. Gilsbar, Inc. 834 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • Butler v. Sudderth 784 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    John Bailey Contractor, (La.
  • Fleming Novelty, Inc. v. Alexander 775 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Id.; John Bailey Contractor
  • Jackson v. Lare 779 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    John Bailey Contractor, Inc. v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, Orr v. Bancroft Bag, Inc., 29,046 (La.App.2d Cir.1/22/97), ; Knight v. State, 30,902 (La.
  • Bartlett Const. Co. Inc. v. St. Bernard Council 763 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • Knight v. State 718 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    John Bailey Contractor, Inc. v. State, DOTD, Orr v. Bancroft Bag, Inc., supra ; Andrus v. Andrus, supra .
  • Adams v. Falcon Equipment Corp. 717 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Company, supra ; John Bailey Contractor
  • Zeringue v. Wireways, Inc. 714 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    & Dev., (quoting American Bank and Trust Co. v. Trinity Universal Ins.
  • Wilridge v. Capitol Manufacturing Co. 704 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • Orr v. Bancroft Bag, Inc. 687 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    John Bailey Contractor, Inc. v. State, DOTD, Andrus, supra .
  • Zeno v. Truck-N-Trailer Equipment Co. 685 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    & Dev., (quoting American Bank and Trust Company v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company, 251 La.
  • Amend v. McCabe 664 So. 2d 1183 La. 1995
    La.Civ.Code art. 2049; John Bailey Contractor, Inc. v. State, Through the Department of Transportation and Development, (citations omitted) ("Courts will not impute to the parties the use of language without meaning or effect.").
  • Morris v. Friedman 663 So. 2d 19 La. 1995
    & Dev., (quoting American Bank and Trust Company v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company, 251 La.
  • Gray v. McCormick 663 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    As recognized in John Bailey Contractor, a requirement for recovery under the theory of detrimental reliance is that the party seeking recovery must have had a justifiable reliance in the representation.
  • McGoldrick v. Lou Ana Foods, Inc. 649 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    John Bailey Contractor, Inc. v. State, through DOTD, teaches that parties to a contract will not be imputed with using language that is meaningless or without effect.
  • McGoldrick v. Lou Ana Foods, Inc. 649 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    John Bailey Contractor, Inc. v. State, through DOTD, teaches that parties to a contract will not be imputed with using language that is meaningless or without effect.
  • Andrus v. Andrus 634 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    John Bailey Contractor, Inc. v. State, DOTD
  • Bidstrup v. Brignac 631 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    In John Bailey Contractor, Inc. v. State, through DOTD, our supreme court sets forth the proposition that parties to a contract will not be imputed with using language that is meaningless or without effect.
  • Ealy v. Hertz Corp. 630 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    John Bailey Contractor, Inc. v. State of Louisiana, through DOTD
  • Weeks v. TL James & Co. Inc. 626 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    A more recent Supreme Court case, John Bailey Contractor, Inc. v. State, through DOTD, teaches that parties to a contract will not be imputed with using language that is meaningless or without effect.
  • Case v. Louisiana Medical Mut. Ins. Co. 624 So. 2d 1285 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    John Bailey Contractor v. State Department of Transportation & Development, Wilkinson v. Wilkinson, supra .
  • Mayor of Morgan City v. Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality 604 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • Boes v. Elmwood Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 595 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    The essential factors which must be established when a party urges equitable estoppel are 1) a representation by conduct or work; 2) a justifiable reliance thereon; and 3) a change of position to one’s detriment because of the reliance, John Bailey Contractor
  • Martin v. Schluntz 589 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • Robbins Tire & Rubber v. Winnfield Retread 577 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    John Bailey Contractor v. State, Dept. of Transportation and Development, American Bank & Trust Co. v. Trinity Universal Ins.
  • O & M CONST. v. State, Div. of Admin. 576 So. 2d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    art. 2050); John Bailey Contractor, Inc. v. State, Department of *1035 Transportation and Development
  • O & M Construction, Inc. v. State, Division of Administration 576 So. 2d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    art. 2050); John Bailey Contractor, Inc. v. State, Department of *1035 Transportation and Development
  • Dye v. Ipik Door Co., Inc. 570 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
    & Dev., the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that estoppels are not favored in law but have been applied when the "ends of justice so require."
  • American Bank & Trust Co. v. Hannie 568 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    John Bailey Contractor, Welch v. Crown Zellerbach Corp., [ ] supra; (La.
  • Lilly v. Angelo 523 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • Edinburgh v. Edinburgh 523 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • Dizell v. Durr 519 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • Jones v. Hospital Corp. of America 516 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    John Bailey Contractor, Inc. v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, First Federal Savings & Loan of Natchitoches v. American Bank and Trust Company, Coushatta, (La.App.
  • Walsh Bros. v. Celeron Corp. 510 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    and Development, When Walsh and LIG agreed in 1979 on Sec.
  • Investors Associates Ltd. v. BF Trappey's Sons 500 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • CLOUD CONST., INC. v. Schneider, Inc. 491 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • Howard Trucking Co., Inc. v. Stassi 485 So. 2d 915 La. 1986
    John Bailey Contractor, Welch v. Crown Zellerbach Corp., supra
  • Chrisman v. Chrisman 487 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    Art. 2053 (see former Art. 1956), John Bailey Contractor