Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Owens v. Martin, 449 So. 2d 448.

75 citing documents.

Tenhaaf v. Quenqui 571 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
Reppond v. City of Denham Springs 572 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
"When an exception of no cause of action is based on an affirmative defense, the exception must be overruled `unless the allegations of the petition exclude every reasonable hypothesis other than the premise upon which the defense is based.'" , 452 (La.
Kok v. Harris 563 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., (La.App.
Bunge Corp. v. Gatx Corp. 557 So. 2d 1376 La. 1990
Lebleu v. Southern Silica of Louisiana 554 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Riddle v. Simmons 548 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Menge v. Menge 545 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
the Supreme Court has further instructed that "when a Court can reasonably do so, it should maintain the petition so as to afford a litigant an opportunity to present his evidence."
Thomas v. State 545 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Bolton v. New England Insurance Co. 542 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Co.] 483 So.2d [987] at 995 [(La.1986)]
BD. OF EXAMINERS OF CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTERS EX REL. JUGE v. Neyrey 542 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Thomas v. Hartford Ins. Co. 540 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
1st Cir.1983), affirmed on other grounds
Trujillo v. Boone 539 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Bryant v. Gillespie Well Service, Inc. 537 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
3d Cir.1963); , 450 at n. 1 (La.1984).
Sunlake Apartment Residents v. Tonti Development Corp. 522 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Malone v. Wright 525 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
*15 Rayne State Bank & Trust, 483 So.2d at 995 ; (La.
Bush v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. 516 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Pierre v. Lallie Kemp Charity Hosp. 515 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
1st Cir.1983), affirmed, appears the following: La.C.C.
LaRue v. Crown Zellerbach Corp. 512 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Great American Insurance Co. v. Hibernia National Bank 506 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
reaffirming Jones v. Texas & Pacific Ry.
Olivier v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh 499 So. 2d 1330 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
reaffirming Jones v. Texas & Pacific Ry.
New South Advertising, Ltd. v. Krock-O-Cheese, Inc. 486 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Rayne State Bank & Trust Co. v. Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co. 483 So. 2d 987 La. 1986
reaffirming Jones v. Texas & Pacific Ry.
Watkins v. J. Ray McDermott, Inc. 466 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Terrebonne Bank & Trust Co. v. Lacombe 464 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
1st Cir. 1983), affirmed on other grounds
Naquin v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. 456 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
We believe it important to stress that there is a difference in the prescription applicable to proceedings in tort (see Owens v. Martin, et al., (La.