Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Walters v. Dept. of Police of New Orleans, 454 So. 2d 106.

283 citing documents.

Flowers v. Dept. of Revenue and Taxation 507 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Juneau v. Louisiana Board of Elementary & Secondary Education ex rel. Louisiana Special Education Center 506 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Juneau v. BD. OF ELEM. SECONDARY ED. 506 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Verret v. Department of Recreation 499 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Brumfield v. Department of Transportation & Development 498 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Roby v. Department of Finance 496 So. 2d 1096 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Taylor v. Department of Health & Human Resources 491 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
PENALTY The Louisiana Supreme Court has stated: “A reviewing court should not reverse a commission conclusion as to the existence or absence of cause for dismissal unless the decision is arbitrary, capricious or an abuse of the commission’s discretion.”
Verneuil v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 485 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
In addition there is recent jurisprudence that points out “[wjhen hearings were conducted before a hearing examiner, courts have applied a less restrictive standard of review and have made an independent review of the record to determine whether the Commission was arbitrary, capricious or manifestly wrong.”
Harper v. LA. STATE BD. OF NURSING 484 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
49:964G(5) and (6); (La.App.
Serpas v. New Orleans Police Department 483 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
It further stated, “[wjhile the suspension may seem to be of unusual length, appellant was responsible for approximately six months of this due to continuances which he requested.” The guidelines for judging the Commission’s
Ziegler v. Department of Fire 478 So. 2d 1357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Nicholas v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 477 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Walters Department of Police of the City of New Orleans
Hubbard v. Department of Finance 474 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Fernandez v. Department of Police 474 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Robinson v. New Orleans Police Department 474 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Curtis v. Sewerage & Water Board 474 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Guillory v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT, DIV. 475 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Rodriguez v. Department of Sanitation 471 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
McStravick v. DEPT. OF REVENUE & TAX. 470 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Department of Corrections, Louisiana State Penitentiary v. Freeman 470 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
The Louisiana Supreme Court granted writs herein, , (La.1984), our prior opinion affirming the demotion of Billy W. Freeman, which demotion was ordered by the appointing authority of the Department of Corrections, and thereafter set aside by the State Civil Service Commission.
Boozer v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources 470 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Department of Corrections, Hunt Correctional Center v. Morgan 469 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
The Loúisiana Supreme Court granted writs in this case
Malone v. Dept. of Corr., La. Training Inst. 468 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Lombas v. Department of Police 467 So. 2d 1273 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Bruno v. Department of Police 462 So. 2d 139 La. 1985
Cartwright v. DEPT. OF REVENUE AND TAXATION 460 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Bosarge v. New Orleans Street Dept. 459 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Howard v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 457 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Department of Corrections, Louisiana State Penitentiary v. Freeman 456 So. 2d 163 La. 1984
Department of Corrections, Hunt Correctional Center v. Morgan 456 So. 2d 163 La. 1984
The judgment of the Court of Appeal is set aside, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal for reconsideration in the light of the standard of review enunciated in Walters v. Department of Police
Morgan v. Chief Administrative Office 455 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Maumus v. Dept. of Police, New Orleans 457 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
A reviewing court must affirm a civil service commission's factual findings unless clearly wrong, and affirm the commission's conclusions on the existence of legal cause and its commensurateness with the penalty imposed, unless "arbitrary, capricious, or characterized by abuse of discretion,"
Thomas v. Department of Welfare 454 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
“In judging the commission’s exercise of its discretion in determining whether the disciplinary action is based on legal cause and the punishment is commensurate with the infraction, the court should not modify the commission’s order unless it is arbitrary, capricious or characterized by abuse of discretion.”