Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Save Ourselves, Inc. v. La. Environ. Cont. Com'n, 452 So. 2d 1152.

115 citing documents.

Jurisich v. Jenkins 749 So. 2d 597 La. 1999
Control Comm'n, : *605 This is a rule of reasonableness which requires an agency or official, before granting approval of proposed action affecting the environment, to determine that adverse environmental impacts have been minimized or avoided as much as possible consistently with the public welfare.
Potier v. Commissioner of Ins. 753 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 2/19/97) , , writ denied, 97-0730 (La.5/1/97), and Save Ourselves, generally for the proposition that "[c]onsiderable latitude must be afforded to administrative agencies to perform the functions delegated to them under law, and courts should hesitate to intervene."
In Re Louisiana Health Service & Indem. 749 So. 2d 610 La. 1999
LeBlanc v. Acadian Ambulance Service, Inc. 746 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Com., cf. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight Systems, Inc., 419 U.S. 281 , 95 S.Ct.
Giles v. Cain 734 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Hall v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety & Corrections 729 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Yuma Petroleum Co. v. Thompson 731 So. 2d 190 La. 1999
Hunt Oil Co. v. Batchelor, 93-3144 (La.10/17/94), (citing Save Ourselves, ).
In re Cadence Environmental Energy, Inc. 714 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
2 ^DISCUSSION The duties of the Secretary of the DEQ were succinctly stated by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Save Ourselves, wherein the court held: The agency is required to use a systematic, interdisciplinary approach to evaluation of each hazardous waste project or facility.
Eicher v. LA. STATE POLICE, RIVERBOAT GAMING ENFOR. DIV. 710 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Bell Oaks v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & HOSPITALS 697 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
49:964(G); Save Ourselves, Matter of E.I.
Girouard v. STATE, THROUGH DEPT. OF EDUC. 694 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
See American Waste and Pollution Control Company, 93-3163, p. 18 (La.9/15/94); ().
Morris & Dickson Co. v. Jones Brothers Co., Inc. 691 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
9/15/94), and Save Ourselves
Inferno Associates, Inc. v. Division of Administration, Office of State Purchasing 692 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Rochon v. Whitley 691 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Environmental Control Commission
Sanders v. Pilley 684 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Save Ourselves *463 v. Louisiana Environmental Control Commission
In Re Dyer 677 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Matter of Ei Du Pont De Nemours & Co. 674 So. 2d 1007 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
The duties of the Secretary of the DEQ were succinctly stated by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Save Ourselves, wherein the court held: The agency is required to use a systematic, interdisciplinary approach to evaluation of each hazardous waste project or facility.
Matter of Rubicon, Inc. 670 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
The duties of the Secretary of DEQ were succinctly stated by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Save Ourselves, wherein the court held: The agency is required to use a systematic, interdisciplinary approach to evaluation of each hazardous waste project or facility.
In re Insulation Technologies, Inc. 669 So. 2d 1343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
In re Cytec Industries, Inc. 672 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
9/15/94); (quoting Save Ourselves); Save Ourselves
In re West Pearl River Navigation Project 657 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
9/15/94); (quoting Save Ourselves, ).
Matter of Browning-Ferris Ind. Petit Bois 657 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Save Ourselves, Inc. v. Louisiana Environmental Control Commission, [3]
Matter of Supplemental Fuels, Inc. 656 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Hunt Oil Co. v. Batchelor 644 So. 2d 191 La. 1994
See Save Ourselves Inc. v. Louisiana Environmental Control Comm., [ (La.
In Matter of American Waste and Pollution Control Co. 642 So. 2d 1258 La. 1994
Com'n, McCowan, Charles S. The Evolution of Environmental Law in Louisiana, 52 La.L.Rev.
Pacificorp Capital, Inc. v. State, Through Division of Administration, Office of State Purchasing 647 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. All Pro Paint & Body Shop, Inc. 639 So. 2d 707 La. 1994
[17] Furthermore, in addition to the explicit standards imposed upon DEQ by the legislature in the HWCL, (La.
Matter of Recovery I, Inc. 635 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Obafunwa Family v. Appeals Bureau 635 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Cox v. Louisiana Department of Agriculture & Forestry 636 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. McHugh 630 So. 2d 1259 La. 1994
Control Comm'n, Matter of Dravo Basic Materials Co., Inc., (La.App.
In re AMCO Construction Co. 633 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Save Ourselves, In the Matter of Sixty Acres, Inc., (La.App.
Bowie v. Louisiana Public Service Com'n 627 So. 2d 164 La. 1993
Port Terminal Railroad Ass'n v. United States, 551 F.2d 1336 (5th Cir.1977).
Matter of American Waste and Pollution Control Co. 633 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
The Louisiana Supreme Court in Save Ourselves, Inc. v. Louisiana Environmental Control Commission, [4] -1157 (La.1984), explained the interrelationship of the constitutional, statutory, and regulatory requirements, as follows: [T]he Natural Resources article of the 1974 Louisiana Constitution imposes a duty of environmental protection on all state agencies and officials, establishes a standard of environmental pro
Matter of Carline Tank Services, Inc. 627 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
However, these standards for review are imposed by analogy in the supreme court opinion of Save Ourselves
Matter of Carline Tank Services, Inc. 626 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
[7] The supreme court in Save Ourselves, notes that the only reason the Administrative Procedures Act is excepted from application to the Environmental Affairs Act is because appeal in environmental matters is directed to the court of appeal rather than to the district court as provided by the Administrative Procedures Act.
Matter of Dravo Basic Materials Co. Inc. 604 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Whether the assistant secretary's findings contain a cost-benefit analysis as required by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Save Ourselves
Zeringue v. Lafourche Parish Office of Eligibility Determination 597 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Matter of Am. Waste & Pollution Control 597 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Courtney and Courtney, Inc. v. Scott 589 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Com'n., Holiday Bossier Ltd., supra.
Matter of American Waste & Poll. Control 588 So. 2d 367 La. 1991
Environmental Control Com'n
Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. State, Department of Environmental Quality 588 So. 2d 367 La. 1991
Environmental Control Com’n
Bizette v. State, Dept. of Public Safety 583 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Magnolia Coal Terminal v. Phillips Oil 576 So. 2d 475 La. 1991
Alliance for Aff. Energy v. New Orleans 578 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
In the Matter of American Waste & Pollution Control Co. 580 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
[14] It was noted in Save Ourselves, that because of the prohibition contained in LSA-R.S.
Louisiana Chemical v. Dept. of Env. Qual. 577 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
In re CECOS International, Inc. ("CECOS") Livingston Facility Permit Application No. LAD00618298 574 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
The secretary failed to conduct the risk benefit analysis required by Save Ourselves
Matter of Cecos Intern., Inc. 574 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
The secretary failed to conduct the risk benefit analysis required by Save Ourselves, (La.
Amoco Production Co. v. Thompson 566 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990