Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Title Research Corp. v. Rausch, 450 So. 2d 933.
- Landis v. Moreau 779 So. 2d 691 La. 2001
- Johnson v. Stalder 754 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
- Bozeman v. Mack 744 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
- Capital City Press v. Metro. Council 696 So. 2d 562 La. 1997
-
State v. Mart
697 So. 2d 1055
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Local 100, Service Employees' International Union v. Forrest, 675 So.2d at 1156 .
- Alliance for Affordable Energy v. Frick 695 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
-
Bauer v. Maestri
676 So. 2d 1096
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
: The right of the public to have access to the public records is a fundamental right, and is guaranteed by the constitution.
- Local 100 v. Forrest 675 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
- Revere v. Reed 675 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
- Elliott v. District Attorney of Baton Rouge 664 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
- Dorson v. State 657 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
-
Foster v. Kemp
657 So. 2d 681
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Finally, common sense advises that, for example, although a clerk of court must accommodate a person of age who wishes himself or herself to reproduce (by photocopying) every deed, mortgage, release, lease, and other land record, (La.
-
Winn v. City of Alexandria
643 So. 2d 902
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Generally, Louisiana law forbids the disclosure of records held by the district attorney that are: “Records pertaining to pending criminal litigation or any criminal litigation which can be reasonably anticipated, until such litigation has been finally adjudicated or otherwise settled.” La.R.S.
- Marler v. Reed 638 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
-
Cardinal Federal Sav. Bank v. Corporate Towers Partners, Ltd.
629 So. 2d 462
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
stated at page 936 and citing McDuffie, supra : "It is fundamental in Louisiana that any person who is not a party to a convention or judicial proceeding involving an immovable may enter into a transaction involving that immovable, and establish his rights therein by relying solely on the public records."
- DeSalvo v. State 624 So. 2d 897 La. 1993
-
Carter v. Connick
623 So. 2d 670
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Article 12, Section 3 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974 grants Louisiana citizens an unequivocal right to examine public records.
- Ferguson v. Stephens 623 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
-
Injury Hotline v. Houck
621 So. 2d 127
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
The Louisiana Supreme Court in Title Researc h interpreted this statute as follows: More specifically, R.S.
- Elliott v. Taylor 614 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
-
State v. Perry
610 So. 2d 746
La. 1992
State Univ., and state rights that have no explicit federal analog
-
Kempf v. Cummings
610 So. 2d 137
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Relying on the Supreme Court’s we ruled for Cummings and permitted him to install his photocopying machine under certain conditions.
-
Revere v. Layrisson
593 So. 2d 397
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
*399 as follows: The right of the public to have access to the public records is a fundamental right, and is guaranteed by the constitution.
- Treadway v. Jones 583 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
- Hatfield v. Bush 572 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
-
Cummings v. Kempf
570 So. 2d 133
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
the Supreme Court, faced with a similar fact situation, found that the above statute is clear and unambiguous in its grant of these alternate rights, and that the choice of which optional right to exercise rests with the one requesting the records, not with the custodian.
- Harrison v. Norris 569 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- State ex. rel. Guste v. Nicholls College Foundation 558 So. 2d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- ASS'N FOR RIGHTS OF CITIZENS, INC. v. Parish of St. Bernard 557 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
-
Hatfield v. Bush
540 So. 2d 1178
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
appears the following: The right of the public to have access to the public records is a fundamental right, and is guaranteed by the constitution.
-
Thornton v. Department of Public Safety
536 So. 2d 595
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
interpreted this statute as follows: More specifically, R.S.
- Hill v. Mamoulides 482 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986