Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Messer v. London, 438 So. 2d 546.

59 citing documents.

Wilson v. Butler 513 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Miller v. Poimboeuf 514 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
residence; if he resides alternatively in several places, and nearly as much in one as in another, and has not declared his intention in the manner hereafter prescribed, any one of the said places where he resides may be considered as his principal establishment *487 at the option of the persons whose interests are thereby affected.’ “The Louisiana Supreme Court, , on the questions of domicile and residence had the following to say: “ ‘Residences and domiciles are not synonymous terms.
Chandler v. Brock 510 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Trotter v. Trotter 503 So. 2d 1160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
art. 38; Succession of Rhea, 227 La.
McLaughlin v. French 492 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
at 547 (La.1983) states: "A change in domicile occurs when there is a change in actual residence accompanied by an intention to make a new principal establishment or home.
Succession of Barnes 490 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Department of Corrections v. Pickens 468 So. 2d 1310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Gowins v. Gowins 466 So. 2d 32 La. 1985
art. 38; [3] *35 (La., 1983); Succession of Rhea, 227 La.
Succession of Danese 459 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984