Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Robertson v. Scanio Produce, 449 So. 2d 459.

48 citing documents.

James Arness Thomas v. Marsala Beverage Company La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
Robertson v. Scanio Produce & Institutional Foods, Inc., (La.
Antippas v. Nola Hotel Grp., LLC 265 So. 3d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Shawn Bernard v. the Hartford Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
To help support his position, Bernard cites Robertson v. Scanio Produce & Institutional Foods, Inc.
Bernard v. Hartford Insurance 12 So. 3d 1098 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
To help support his position, Bernard cites Robertson v. Scanio Produce & Institutional Foods, Inc.
Randy Fontenot v. Patterson Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Fontenot v. Patterson Insurance 5 So. 3d 954 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Randy Fontenot v. Patterson Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
“In evaluating the evidence, the trier of fact should accept as true the uncontradicted testimony of a witness, even though the witness is a party, where the record indicates no sound reason for its rejection.” Robertson v. Scanio Produce & 8 Institutional Foods, Inc.
Fontenot v. PATTERSON INS. 972 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Robertson v. Scanio Produce & Institutional Foods, Inc.
James v. Robinson 880 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Robertson v. Scanio Produce and Institutional Foods, Inc., (La.App.
James v. Robinson 880 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Robertson v. Scanio Produce and Institutional Foods, Inc., (La.App.
Beasley v. Ed's Mobile Homes, Inc. 824 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Robertson v. Scanio Produce & Institutional Foods, Inc.
Perow v. Lenzly 716 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Rhoto v. La. Transmission Parts 670 So. 2d 1388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Robertson v. Scanio Produce & Institutional Foods, Inc., Haughton v. Fireman’s Fund American Ins.
Harrison v. Gore 660 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Roszell v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. 602 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
The reasoning of Lucas is discussed and applied in many cases decided since, including specifically Robertson vs. Scanio Produce, Beauclair vs. Rockwood Insurance Company, 430 So.
Zeigler v. Pleasant Manor Nursing Home 600 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Robertson v. Scapio Produce and Institutional Foods, Inc., West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc.
Withers v. Timber Products, Inc. 574 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Duncan v. STATE, DOTD 556 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
McCray v. Abraham 550 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
In Robertson v. Scanio Produce & Institutional Foods, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "In evaluating evidence, the trier of fact should accept as true the uncontradicted testimony of a witness even though the witness is a party, where the record indicates no sound reason for its rejection."
Tassin v. New Orleans Delivery Service 550 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Robertson v. Scanio Produce and Institutional Foods, Inc., Randall v. St.
Toth v. Ensco Environmental Services, Inc. 546 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Robertson v. Scanio Produce & Institutional Foods, Inc., Haughton v. Fireman's Fund American Ins.
Aycock v. City of Shreveport 535 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Gonzales v. Babco Farm, Inc. 535 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Robertson v. Scanio Produce and Institutional Foods, Inc., Jones v. Alexander, supra ; Honore v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., (La.App.
Gonzales v. Barco Farm, Inc. 535 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Robertson v. Scanio Produce and Institutional Foods, Inc., Jones v. Alexander, supra; Honore v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., (La.App.
Marcotte v. Gulf Builders, Inc. 525 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Robertson v. Scanio Produce & Institutional Foods, Inc., (La.
Robertson v. POPEYE'S FAMOUS FRIED CHICKEN, INC. 524 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Robertson v. Scanio Produce, Inc., (La.
State v. Easley 517 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
where the record indicates no sound reason for its rejection....” at 462, 463.
Keith v. Office of Risk Management 516 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Robertson v. Scanio Produce & Institutional Foods, Inc., (La.
First Financial Bank, FSB v. Austin 514 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Hartman v. Dittco Division of National Steel Products Co. 510 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Hartman v. DITTCO DIV., NAT. STEEL PROD. 510 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Whatley v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 509 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
In support of his position he cites the following cases: Robertson v. Scanio Produce & Institutional Foods, Inc., West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc.
International Stevedores, Inc. v. Hanlon 499 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
APPOINTING AUTH., CHIEF OF POLICE FOR CITY OF KENNER v. Trippi 499 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Gullage v. F.W. Woolworth Co. 492 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Robertson v. Scanio Produce and Institutional Foods, Inc., Randall, supra.
Duckworth v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 490 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Robertson v. Scanio Produce & Institutional Foods, Inc.
Stevenson v. Bolton Co., Inc. 484 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Lloyd v. City Products Corp. 486 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Robertson v. Scanio Produce & Institutional Foods, Inc.
Dickerson v. Zurich-American Ins. Co. 479 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Randall v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 470 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Robertson v. Scanio Produce and Institutional Foods, Inc.
Lewis v. Alloy Casting of La., Inc. 465 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Walton v. Normandy Village Homes Ass'n 460 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
at p. 461 and citations therein.
Hughes v. Querbes & Nelson, Inc. 460 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Long v. Moses Motor Hotel, Inc. 460 So. 2d 1156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Morgan v. General Motors Corp. 459 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
the Louisiana Supreme Court reviewed legal principles pertinent in the present case: “The plaintiff in a worker compensation suit must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the injury sustained was caused by the accident at issue.
Sanders v. Mid-South Trucking, Inc. 458 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Polk v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 455 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
our Supreme Court, in addressing the issue of causation, stated: “The causal relationship between a work accident and an employee’s disability may be inferred when there is proof of an accident and .an ensuing disability without an intervening cause.
Johnson v. Ins. Co. of N. America 454 So. 2d 1113 La. 1984
Robertson v. Scanio Produce and Institutional Foods, Inc., West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc.