Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Lyons, 452 So. 2d 1161.
- Succession of McEwen 466 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
-
Poynot v. Pfister
461 So. 2d 1070
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
The entire record considered, we cannot conclude that the trial court was clearly wrong, in its conclusion that, in effect, opponents overcame the presumption of capacity by “clear and convincing evidence,” and proved that decedent lacked testamentary capacity on August 12 and 28, 1977 and April 18, 1978.
- Holcomb v. Baker 459 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
-
State v. Johnson
458 So. 2d 937
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
What constitutes clear and convincing evidence has been defined in as follows: The traditional measure of persuasion in civil cases is a preponderance of the evidence, but there are a limited number of claims and contentions governed by an intermediate standard, usually termed `clear and convincing evidence.'