Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Corbello v. Sutton, 446 So. 2d 301.

41 citing documents.

TDX Associates, LP v. The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Louisiana Environmental Action Network v. Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Franklin v. City of Alexandria 272 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Corbello v. Sutton , , 302 (La.1984).
Armstead Franklin v. City of Alexandria La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
The equitable doctrine of laches, therefore, has no application in such cases.”
Michael Green v. Town of Lake Arthur La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State, Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission v. Louisiana State Police Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Division, 95-2355 (La.App.
Board of Ethics In re Savoie 224 So. 3d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Leonard Cardenas, III 145 So. 3d 362 La. 2014
at 9 (), meant that respondent’s case, in which he “sought expungement of his arrest record”, id.
Roberson v. Roberson 122 So. 3d 561 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
Louisiana Land Acquisition, LLC v. Louisiana Dept. of Environmental Quality, 2011-2037 (La.App.
Louisiana Land Acquisition, LLC v. Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality 97 So. 3d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Green v. Town of Lake Arthur 255 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See Corbello v. Sutton , , 303 (La.1984) ; State, Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission v. Louisiana State Police Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Division , 95-2355 (La.App.
Willows v. State, Department of Health & Hospitals 15 So. 3d 56 La. 2009
:965 provides that under the LAPA, “[a]n aggrieved party may obtain a review of any final judgment of the district court by appeal to the appropriate circuit court of appeal [and that] [t]he appeal shall be taken as in other civil cases.” However, “the LAPA was not intended to supersede the more specific provisions of other administrative acts.” Metro Riverboat, supra at 662
Fishbein v. STATE EX REL. LSU 898 So. 2d 1260 La. 2005
("[T]he doctrine of laches has no place in the law of this state.").
Fishbein v. State ex rel. Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center 898 So. 2d 1260 La. 2005
(“[T]he doctrine of laches has no place in the law of this state.”).
Terry L. Piper v. Shakti, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State, Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission v. Louisiana State Police Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Division, 95-2355 (La.App.
Piper v. Shakti, Inc. 856 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State, Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission v. Louisiana State Police Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Division, 95-2355 (La.
Metro Riverboat Associates, Inc. v. Louisiana Gaming Control Bd. 797 So. 2d 656 La. 2001
Metro Riverboat Associates v. La. Gaming Bd. 774 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Victorian v. Stalder 770 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State, Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission v. Louisiana State Police Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Division, 95-2355 (La.App.
Louisiana State Board of Embalmers & Funeral Directors v. Caskets Direct, Inc. 716 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
RCS Gaming, Inc. v. State ex rel. Louisiana Gaming Control Board 705 So. 2d 1124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Louisiana Insurance Rating Commission, 96-0793 (La.App.
Liberty Mut. v. La. Ins. Rating Com'n 696 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Hayden v. New Orleans Baton Rouge Steamship Pilots Fee Commission 690 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Instead, it was intended to create procedures in those instances where none existed.”
Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Co. v. Green 657 So. 2d 1052 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
The Louisiana Supreme Court has stated that the LAPA “was not intended to supersede the specific provisions of other administrative acts, or to supersede the rights and remedies created under those acts.” Flynn v. State, Department of Public Safety & Correction, , 996 n. 4 (La.1992)
State v. LOUISIANA RIVERBOAT GAMING COM'N & HORSESHOE ENTERT. 655 So. 2d 292 La. 1995
to support its contention that because the Riverboat Gaming Act defines person to include "other legal entities," the Division is a person.
Hibernia Nat. Bank v. LA TAX COM'N 652 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Benoit v. Devillier 649 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Similarly, the Louisiana Supreme Court concluded that resort to laches was unnecessary since an appropriate time delay existed under LSA-R.S.
In Matter of American Waste and Pollution Control Co. 642 So. 2d 1258 La. 1994
State v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Com'n 640 So. 2d 1368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
McGowan v. Commissioner of Conservation 636 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
30:12, which provides the exclusive means of judicial review of an action by the Commissioner, ( and provides as follows: A. (1) A person who is aggrieved by any law of this state with respect to conservation of oil or gas, or both, or by a provision of this Chapter, or by a rule, regulation, or order made by the assistant secretary of the office of conservation hereunder, or by an act done or threaten
Matter of Carline Tank Services, Inc. 627 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
In 1984, the Louisiana Supreme Court, settled what had been a series of confusing and conflicting opinions by this circuit on the question of the proper method of appeal from the decisions of the commissioner of conservation.
Flynn v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORR. 608 So. 2d 994 La. 1992
Mayor of Morgan City v. Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality 604 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Crochet Equipment v. Board of Sup'rs 597 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the issue of applicability of the APA in light of the Conservation Act.
State Ex Rel. Guste v. Thompson 532 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Loop, Inc. v. Collector of Revenue 523 So. 2d 201 La. 1988
see also, Whitney National Bank v. Bank of New Orleans & Trust Co., 379 U.S. 411 , 85 S.Ct.
Campbell v. St. Tammany Parish Police Jury 517 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
App. 1st Cir.1983), aff'd, this court recognized, again, the fundamental precept that an initial requirement of any due process claim is the existence of a liberty or property interest adversely affected.
Louisiana State Medical Soc. v. La. State Bd. of Nursing 493 So. 2d 581 La. 1986
La. State Med. Soc. v. La. State Bd. of Nursing 484 So. 2d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
is determinative of the issue presented herein.
Harper v. LA. STATE BD. OF NURSING 484 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Osborne v. Stone 472 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Jordan v. Sutton 450 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
our Supreme Court ruled that the equitable doctrine of laches "has no place in the law of this state.” .