Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite McCastle v. Rollins Environmental Services of La., Inc., 456 So. 2d 612.

142 citing documents.

Banks v. New York Life Ins. Co. 705 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
McCastle v. Rollins Environmental Services of Louisiana, Inc.
Clement v. Occidental Chemical Corp. 699 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Articles 591 and 592; citing State ex rel.
Ford v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc. 703 So. 2d 542 La. 1997
Lewis v. Texaco Exploration Prod. Co. 698 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
McCastle v. Rollins Environmental Services of Louisiana, Inc., Boudreaux v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 96-0137, p. 6 (La.App.
In Re Gas Water Heater Prod. Litigation 697 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Apolinar v. PROF. CONST. SERVICES, INC. 694 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Dumont v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., 95-2010, p. 3 (La.App.
Cotton v. Gaylord Container 691 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
McCastle v. Rollins Environmental Services of Louisiana, Inc., Livingston, 598 So.2d at 1182 ; Ellis, 550 So.2d at 1315 .
Boudreaux v. STATE, DOTD 690 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
McCastle v. Rollins Environmental Services of Louisiana, Inc., (La.
Thomas v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. 683 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Pulver v. 1st Lake Properties, Inc. 681 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Articles 591 and 592 [1] ; (La.
Ford v. Murphy Oil USA 681 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
McCastle v. Rollins Environmental Services of La., Inc.
Megatrend Telecommunications, Inc. v. Rees Marine, Inc. 673 So. 2d 1098 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
McCastle v. Rollins Environmental Services of Louisiana, Inc., Lailhengue v. Mobil Oil Company, et al, (La.App.
Richardson v. American Cyanamid Co. 672 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
McCastle v. Rollins Environmental Services of Louisiana, Inc.
Dumont v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. 670 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
1st Cir.1983), rev'd on other grounds
Greater No Car Dealers Ass'n v. La. Tax Com'n 663 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Vela v. Plaquemines Parish Government 658 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
*48 McCastle v. Rollins Environmental Services of Louisiana, Inc.
Olavarriette v. Tonti Properties, Inc. 658 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
McGee v. Shell Oil Co. 659 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
As discussed in McCastle v. Rollins Environmental Services of Louisiana, Inc., it is well settled that it is plaintiff's burden to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the following three elements must be met for a class action to be appropriate: 1.
Lailhengue v. Mobil Oil Co. 657 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
McCastle v. Rollins Environmental Services of Louisiana, Inc., (La.
Eubanks v. Bayou D'Arbonne Lake Watershed District 649 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
McCastle v. Rollins Environmental Services of Louisiana, Inc.
Lewis v. Roemer 643 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Strong v. Bell South Communications, Inc. 643 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
591 and 592; State ex rel.
Stoute v. Wagner & Brown 637 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
McCastle v. Rollins Environmental Services of Louisiana, Inc., (La.
Atkins v. Harcross Chemicals, Inc. 638 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Dumas v. Angus Chemical Co. 635 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
The *450 seminal cases on the issue are McCastle v. Rollins Environmental Services of Louisiana, Inc., State ex rel.
Spitzfaden v. Dow Corning Corp. 619 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
McCastle v. Rollins Environmental Services of Louisiana, Inc.
Adams v. CSX Railroads 615 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Becnel v. United Gas Pipeline Co. 613 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
Rivera v. United Gas Pipeline Co. 613 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
(on rehearing), and Stevens v. *1154 Board of Trustees
Livingston Parish Police Jury v. Acadiana Shipyards 598 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
McCastle v. Rollins Environmental Services of Louisiana, Inc.
Distinguished Brumfield v. ROLLINS ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. 589 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Plaintiffs' reliance upon McCastle v. Rollins Environmental Services of Louisiana, Inc., as definitively proving their case is misplaced.
Ellis v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. 550 So. 2d 1310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
The most recent enunciation of the analysis to be used, with particular focus on the aspect of "common character," (La.
Casse v. Sumrall 547 So. 2d 1381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Phillips v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 541 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Farlough v. Smallwood 524 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Hatheway v. John 517 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
591-92; Brown v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (La.App.
Terrebonne Bank & Trust Co. v. Lacombe 510 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
In light of Stevens, supra, we remanded the case with instructions to the trial court to reconsider Lacombe's claim for a class action against Terrebonne Bank & Trust Company in accordance with the guidelines for class action certification as propounded by the Supreme Court in McCastle .
Brown v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 506 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
and McCastle v. Rollins Environmental Services, Inc.
O'Halleron v. Lec, Inc. 471 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Hunter v. Union Carbide Corp. 468 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
into multiple lawsuits, to the prejudice of its manageability and the judicial efficiency contemplated by this procedural device.” in which the Supreme Court, in reversing both (1) a district court judgment denying class action and (2) an affirming opinion from the First Circuit reported at , found that the class in question was so numerous that individual join-der was impractical, that the representative parties were pro
Terrebonne Bank & Trust Co. v. Lacombe 464 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
set forth the proper guidelines for class action certification.
Pellerin v. LA. HEALTH SERVICE & INDEM. CO. 460 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984