Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Johnson v. Ins. Co. of N. America, 454 So. 2d 1113.

126 citing documents.

Scott v. Town of Jonesville 676 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Brian v. O.S. Johnson Construction Co. 676 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Vallelungo v. City of New Orleans 673 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Orgeron v. Tri-State Road Boring, Inc.
Boutte v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 674 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
George v. M & G Testing and Services, Inc. 663 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Anderson v. Biedenharn Bottling Group 664 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Sinegal v. Able Glass Co., Inc. 663 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Arnold v. Cavanaugh Aviation 663 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Hatten v. Price 663 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Gardner v. McDonald 660 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Lemoine v. Hessmer Nursing Home 651 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Weatherford v. Commercial Union Ins. 650 So. 2d 763 La. 1995
1987); Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., (La.
Smith v. State Dept. of Health & Hosp. 650 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Layssard v. City of Alexandria 643 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Walker v. Gaines P. Wilson & Son, Inc., ”
Clark v. State, Department of Corrections 643 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Co. of N. America,, -1119 (La.1984) (La.App.
Penn v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 638 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Pickett v. Stine Lumber Co. 640 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Menard v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 640 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
1986); Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
State in Interest of AC 643 So. 2d 719 La. 1994
Co. of North America, (La.
Kelley v. Louisiana Limestone Aggregates, Inc. 630 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Martin v. Criminal Sheriff of Orleans Parish 629 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
: An employee who can only work in substantial pain may be totally disabled.
Hopes v. Domtar Industries 627 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Co. of N. America, -1119 (La.1984); (La.App.
Feigler v. Transit Management of Southeast Louisiana, Inc. 626 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
1986); Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Bailey v. Smelser Oil & Gas, Inc. 620 So. 2d 277 La. 1993
Bradley v. Justiss Oil Co., Inc. 618 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Bruno v. Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. 617 So. 2d 1351 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Co. of North America, (La.
Provost v. Provost 617 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Humphrey v. Humphrey 614 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Fuller v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., (La.App.
Hinton v. Scott Hydraulics, Inc. 614 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Zeigler v. Pleasant Manor Nursing Home 600 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
the Supreme Court stated: "An employee who can only work in substantial pain may be totally disabled.
Miles v. Perroncel 598 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident *667 & Indemnity Co., "
Borne v. Tompkins-Beckwith, Inc. 595 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Co. of N. America, Whitaker v. Church’s, (La.
Dugas v. Frederick 594 So. 2d 1372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Behmke v. K-Mart Corp. 581 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
AMKU TRUST v. Talley 580 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Canter, supra at 724 ; Virgil v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Picou v. Circle, Inc. 578 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
Co. of N. America, the court set out the principles regarding disability because of pain as follows: An employee who can only work in substantial pain may be totally disabled.
Pierce v. Aetna Life and Cas. Ins. Co. 572 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Green v. Cement Products Services, Inc., (La.App.
Allen v. IMTC, INC. 567 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., "
Harrington v. Velinsky 567 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Hutchinson v. Livingston Wood Products 562 So. 2d 883 La. 1990
: A medical witness may possess a peculiar competence to testify on questions of medical causation and of possible relation of symptoms to the medical injury.
Montalbano v. State Bd. of Medical Examiners 560 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., (La.
Galentine v. First Family Financial Services 557 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Jaffarzad v. Jones Truck Lines, Inc. 561 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Nichols v. US Rentals, Inc. 556 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., (La.
Sicarelli v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 556 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Co., Williams v. Keystone General Contractors, Inc., Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Mills v. Guaranty Indus. Contractors 557 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
King v. Travelers Ins. Co. 553 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
App. 3 Cir.1983), reversed on other grounds, this court stated that subsequent to an initial medical report, if an insurer receives medical information showing that a disability remains, the insurer has a duty to investigate.
Dailey v. Royal Insurance Co. 551 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Zycha v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 551 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
It is well settled that worker’s compensation laws must be liberally interpreted in favor of the injured worker; thus, we do not read Brooks as standing for the proposition that an injured worker must prove that his disfigurement has impaired or reduced his earning capacity in order to recover under La.R.S.
Rosell v. Esco 549 So. 2d 840 La. 1989
1986); Crump v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.