Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Williams on Behalf of Williams v. Kushner, 449 So. 2d 455.

42 citing documents.

Khammash v. Clark 145 So. 3d 246 La. 2014
see also Hanks, 04-1485 at p. 9, 904 So.2d at 667 .
Teague v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 10 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
King v. Brown Development, Inc. 4 So. 3d 231 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Romero v. Elias 972 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Peter Romero v. Darryl Elias, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Berthelot v. Patients' Compensation Fund Oversight Board 977 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Hanks v. Seale 904 So. 2d 662 La. 2005
Farve v. Jarrott 886 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Randy Hanks v. Dr. A. Kent Seale La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Hanks v. Seale 872 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Diana Weeks v. Louisiana Patients Compensation Fund La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Weeks v. Louisiana Patient's Compensation Fund 858 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
Ginn v. Woman's Hospital Foundation, Inc. 818 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
The Supreme Court’s wherein the Court discussed the status of the Fund as an intervenor after a settlement, are also relevant: The status of the Fund after a settlement between the claimant and the health care provider is more in the nature of a statutory intervenor rather than a party defendant.
Bennett v. Krupkin 798 So. 2d 940 La. 2001
458 n. 16 (La.1984); Felix v. St.
UNITED MEDICAL CORP. OF LOUISIANA v. Johns 798 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Coleman v. Deno 787 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Evans v. Nogues 775 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
LeBlanc v. Barry 771 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
we stated that the only party defendant contemplated by the act is the health care provider.
Potier v. Commissioner of Ins. 753 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Remet v. Martin 737 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
The Fund is a "budget unit" of the State.
Hunter v. Bossier Medical Center 718 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Prior to the enactment of § 5105B, the Louisiana Supreme Court, specifically addressed the application of La.
Bonano v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 2 666 So. 2d 653 La. 1996
458 n. 16 (La.1984); ,1374 (La.1990).
Horil v. Scheinhorn 663 So. 2d 697 La. 1995
513 , 112 L.Ed.2d 525 (1990)
Knight v. Louisiana Patient's Compensation Fund 638 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Dodson v. Community Blood Center 633 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Rodriguez v. LOUISIANA MEDICAL MUT. INS. CO. 620 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
Rodriguez v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Co. 620 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Payne v. New Orleans General Hosp. 611 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Roy v. Gupta 606 So. 2d 940 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Schwarzenburg v. Jackson 600 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Mumphrey v. Gessner 581 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Koslowski v. Sanchez 576 So. 2d 470 La. 1991
Ewing v. Aubert 566 So. 2d 616 La. 1990
Stuka v. Fleming 561 So. 2d 1371 La. 1990
Williams v. Kushner 549 So. 2d 294 La. 1989
Pursuant to this court's decision reported at a jury trial as to quantum was held in October 1984, resulting in a $1,829,000 verdict.
Stuka v. Fleming 543 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
the Fund was entitled to a jury trial.
Kelty v. Brumfield 534 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Stuka v. Fleming 532 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Williams v. Kushner 524 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Lamark v. NME Hospitals, Inc. 522 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
the plaintiff, a victim of malpractice, settled with the physician/defendant for his statutory limit of $100,000 and then sought excess damages from the Fund.
Felix v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 477 So. 2d 676 La. 1985
we stated that the only party defendant contemplated by the act is the health care provider.
Heindel v. Harley-Davidson Motorcycles 467 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
where a trial court in a medical malpractice suit declared La.R.S.