DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gachez v. Gachez, 451 So. 2d 608.

25 citing documents.

  • Yachet McLauren Versus Carmiko Dixon McLauren La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
  • Bourgeois v. Bourgeois 40 So. 3d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Despite the language of Art. 2365, -614 (La.App.
  • Mason v. Mason 927 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    4th Cir.1989); Davezac v. Davezac, supra ; (La.App.
  • Diane M. Sheridon, Born Richard v. Jonathan Sheridon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Despite Gachez’ unique set of facts and its decision, which deviated from codal authority, without recognizing Gachez’ different circumstances, subsequent cases 4 (La.App.
  • Sheridon v. Sheridon 867 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Stewart v. Stewart 728 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    5 Cir.1984); , writ denied, 84-1121 (La.9/14/84); .
  • Gautreau v. Gautreau 697 So. 2d 1339 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
  • Chance v. Chance 694 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    Although conceding the correctness of the amount requested ($4,887), (La.
  • Bergeron v. Bergeron 693 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
  • Charrier v. Charrier 653 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • Keller v. Schilling 593 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • Williams v. Williams 590 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
  • Oliver v. Oliver 561 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • Guarisco v. Guarisco 526 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Louisiana Civil Code Articles 2365, 2367; ([La.App.]
  • Guarisco v. Guarisco 526 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Louisiana Civil Code Articles 2365, 2367; ([La.App.]
  • Conner v. Conner 515 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • Mara v. Mara 513 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • Williams v. Williams 509 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    Appellee contends, however, (La.App.
  • Barry v. Barry 501 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
    The issue raised by the defendant regarding credits for mortgage payments made by Mrs. Barry arises from the following calculation by the notary (record, p. 122): F. Computation of Credit: (See Gachez vs. Gachez, — Fifth Circuit Court—Writ denied (1984).
  • Dillenkoffer v. Dillenkoffer 492 So. 2d 71 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    However, (5th Cir.1984) this court noted: "Appellant's final contention is that the court erred in failing to reimburse him for all of the car notes paid by him from the termination of the community until the time of trial, a period of 17 months.
  • Nash v. Nash 486 So. 2d 1011 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • Davezac v. Davezac 483 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • Gilley v. Ketchens 478 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • Feazel v. Feazel 471 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • Gachez v. Gachez 456 So. 2d 166 La. 1984