Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Louviere v. Shell Oil Co., 440 So. 2d 93.

65 citing documents.

Lebleu v. Southern Silica of Louisiana, Inc. 579 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
STATE, DEPT. OF REV. & TAX. v. Succession of Pope 579 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Provident Life and Acc. Ins. v. Turner 582 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Provident's first proposition, that the Turners' suit interrupted prescription as to *253 its claim for reimbursement, and that prescription began to run anew from the dismissal of that suit
Pickard v. Baugh 565 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Case v. Richard 536 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
See, for example, Bellamy v. Garber Brothers, Inc., (La.App.
WOOD ON BEHALF HAYES v. Hayes 524 So. 2d 241 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Moraus v. State, through DOTD, supra; Hildebrand v. Schnell, supra
Roger v. Estate of Moulton 513 So. 2d 1126 La. 1987
we answered *1134 a similar question certified to us by the United States Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, and said, "When an employer's compensation insurer files suit to recover compensation benefits paid to an injured employee and thereby interrupts prescription on the employee's claim arising from the sa
Hebert v. Doctors Memorial Hosp. 486 So. 2d 717 La. 1986
art. 1793), [2] and the interruption continued as long as suit against the hospital was pending
Hebert v. Doctors Memorial Hosp. 477 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Bellamy v. Garber Bros., Inc. 472 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Revere v. Risley 470 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
the Supreme Court of Louisiana stated: “...
First Stake Insurance Com. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 464 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Giroir v. South Louisiana Medical Center 453 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Facts similar to those of Allstate v. Theriot
Knight v. Samuel 447 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Hildebrand v. Schnell 441 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
: "The filing by one party of a suit to recover his damages usually does not affect the running of prescription against other parties who sustained separate damages in the same accident ...."