State v. Napoli
State v. Napoli, 437 So. 2d 868 (La. 1983).
Cited by
Explained in 1
- State of Louisiana v. Ashaki Okung Kelly La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
- State v. Kelly 153 So. 3d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
- State v. Burton 116 So. 3d 863 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
- State v. Phillips 834 So. 2d 972 La. 2002
- State v. Williams 800 So. 2d 790 La. 2001
- State v. Huls 676 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
- State v. Lucas 598 So. 2d 338 La. 1992
- State v. Arrington 556 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- State v. Fraser 484 So. 2d 122 La. 1986
- State v. Breaux 471 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. Wade 470 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. Fraser 471 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Goodley 398 So. 2d 1068
- State v. Napoli 428 So. 2d 957
Opinion text
437 So.2d 868 (1983) STATE of Louisiana v. Charles NAPOLI. No. 83-K-0667. Supreme Court of Louisiana. September 2, 1983. PER CURIAM. GRANTED IN PART. When the defendant alone seeks review of a conviction and sentence, the court of appeal should review only those issues raised by the defendant and any patent errors favorable to defendant. The court of appeal erred in this case by reviewing a sentencing error unfavorable to defendant, thereby providing a chilling effect on defendant's exercise of his right to appeal. State v. Goodley, 398 So.2d 1068 (La.1981). The judgment of the court of appeal, 428 So.2d 957 , is set aside as to the sentence for attempted aggravated crime against nature, and the original sentence of the trial court is reinstated. Otherwise the writ is denied.