Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hocum, 456 So. 2d 602.

29 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Tyler N. Derochowski La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
State v. Barnett 267 So. 3d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Hocum , , 604 (La.
State v. Platt 998 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Franklin 956 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Legrand, supra , cert.
State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
State v. Cantanese, supra at 981.
State v. Weatherspoon 948 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
[33] State v. Legrand, supra , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Paul Junius Felix La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
“A reversal and a new trial is required only if there is a reasonable possibility that the error complained of might have contributed to the conviction.” Prudhomme, 819 So.2d at 451
State v. Felix 918 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Prudhomme, 819 So.2d at 451
State v. Leger 907 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State of Louisiana v. David Lee Leger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Consistent with this view, the Court has “made it clear” that the rule excluding polygraph evidence “also operates to prevent any reference during trial to the fact that a witness has taken a polygraph examination with respect to the subject matter of his testimony.” cert.
State v. Legrand 864 So. 2d 89 La. 2004
State v. Prudhomme 819 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
State v. Cowart 815 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
2252 , 150 L.Ed.2d 239 (2001), cert.
State v. Cosey 779 So. 2d 675 La. 2000
State v. Evans 734 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Coleman 720 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Hicks 607 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Womack 592 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Larson 579 So. 2d 1050 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Montgomery 575 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Kimmel 571 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State v. Semien 566 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State v. Romero 552 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Johnson 544 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 , 92 S.Ct.
State v. Arnold 533 So. 2d 1311 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Parker 530 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Mills 505 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Landry 502 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Loyd 489 So. 2d 898 La. 1986
Results of polygraph examinations are generally inadmissible, although in certain narrow instances the results may be allowed.