DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ruffin, 448 So. 2d 1274.

69 citing documents.

  • State v. Baldwin 79 So. 3d 1258 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • State of Louisiana v. Brandon Dale Allen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    2317, 76 L.Ed.2d 527] (1983)
  • State v. Allen 79 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 ] (1983)
  • State v. Holmes 10 So. 3d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 ] (1983)
  • State v. Marley 945 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)
  • State v. Harris 916 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Long 884 So. 2d 1176 La. 2004
    2041, 2043 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); -96 (La.1985)
  • State v. Pham 839 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    329 , 3 L.Ed.2d 327 (1959)
  • State v. Lumpkin 813 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Thompson 806 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 ] (1983)
  • State v. Watson 774 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir.1992) wherein courts found that lack of corroboration of an informant's tip rendered investigatory stops invalid.
  • State v. Creecy 742 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Williams 735 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 ] (1983)
  • State v. Clay 731 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    281 , 88 L.Ed.2d 246 ; (La.App.
  • State v. Fisher 720 So. 2d 1179 La. 1998
    2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)
  • State v. Alexander 632 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    2317, 2327-28 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)
  • State v. Bourque 622 So. 2d 198 La. 1993
    Officers may conduct a limited search for weapons during a lawful investigatory stop, Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct.
  • State v. Moreno 619 So. 2d 62 La. 1993
    5th Cir. 1991); (La.App.
  • State v. 77,014.00 DOLLARS 607 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Noto 596 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    281 , 88 L.Ed.2d 246 (1985); (La.App.
  • State v. Guy 575 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
    281 , 88 L.Ed.2d 246 (1985)
  • State v. Knight 574 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Simms 571 So. 2d 145 La. 1990
  • State v. Desdunes 576 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Johnson 557 So. 2d 1030 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Simms 554 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    the Supreme Court defined probable cause as follows: “Probable cause to arrest without a warrant exists when the facts and circumstances within the officer’s knowledge, or of which he had reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient to justify a man of ordinary caution in believing that the person to
  • State v. Tyler 548 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    The observations and additional investigation of the officers further corroborated the confidential informant’s tip and provided enough additional facts for this court to conclude that probable cause for arrest existed under the test of “totality of the circumstances” even considering the restrictive view imposed by the Louisiana Supreme Court [in Raheem, supra, ].
  • State v. Gervais 546 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
    223 , 13 L.Ed.2d 142 (1964)
  • State v. Gervais 546 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    223 , 13 L.Ed.2d 142 (1964)
  • State v. Rosell 544 So. 2d 1296 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    “Probable cause to arrest exists when the facts and circumstances known to the officer and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information are sufficient to justify a man of ordinary caution in believing the person to be arrested has committed a. crime.” State v. Wilson, supra, at 515
  • State v. Jarmon 543 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Hargrove 535 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Roebuck 530 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    281 , 88 L.Ed.2d 246 (1985)
  • State v. Massey 529 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Nebar 529 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    “Probable cause to arrest exists when the facts and circumstances known to the officer and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information are sufficient to justify a man of ordinary caution in believing the person to be arrested has committed a crime.” State v. Wilson, at 515; (La.
  • State v. Green 524 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Geraci 518 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Williams 515 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Johnson 513 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89 , 85 S.Ct.
  • State v. Wiley 507 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • Distinguished State v. Hubbard 506 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    [2] two cases involving warrantless arrests based on information received from confidential informants who failed to disclose the basis of their knowledge.
  • State v. Digilormo 505 So. 2d 1154 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Ford 503 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    the defendant argues that there was no probable cause for his arrest and that the trial court should have granted his motion to suppress the evidence.
  • State v. Freeman 503 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Dakin 495 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Jones 495 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    In granting the defendants’ motions to suppress all defendants’ statements as well as evidence of the stolen property seized by the police
  • State v. Glenn 493 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Williams 489 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Larsen 489 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    223 , 13 L.Ed.2d 142 (1964)
  • State v. Williams 489 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986