DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Camp, 446 So. 2d 1207.

131 citing documents.

  • State v. Cass 514 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Mussall 514 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Hernandez 513 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Lynch 512 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Vanvorst 505 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Mercadel 503 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Landry 499 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. McIntyre 496 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    State v. Harper, supra .
  • State v. Petta 496 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. McBride 492 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Barnes 489 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Nelson 487 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, stated: La.
  • State v. Francis 482 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Harper 480 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Jackson 480 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Robinson 480 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Ricaud 480 So. 2d 1019 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Hernandez 478 So. 2d 1326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    5th Cir.1985), we stated our standard of review regarding sufficiency of the evidence, -09 (La.1984), which states: La.Const.
  • State v. Bruce 472 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    -09 (La.1984), which states: * * * * * * La.
  • State v. White 472 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Stevenson 466 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Evans 463 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Smith 461 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    15:438 4 is useful in determining the existence of a reasonable doubt, “because, when the overall evidence, direct and circumstantial, does not exclude a reasonable hypothesis of innocence, there exists a reasonable doubt as to guilt.”
  • State v. Ross 463 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Patterson 459 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    With respect to the question of sufficiency of evidence, stated: "...
  • State v. Johnson 458 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Crawford 458 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Monk 454 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
  • State v. Roberson 454 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Felo 454 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Smith 450 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    A rational trier of fact could reasonably conclude that that or those circumstances constitute “proof beyond a reasonable doubt,” that defendant knew or should have known the motorcycle was stolen.