DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Clark, 442 So. 2d 460.

37 citing documents.

  • State v. Williams 149 So. 3d 462 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    2d Cir.1983), writ denied, State v. Howard, 31,807 (La.App.2d Cir.8/18/99), , writ denied, 1999-2960 (La.5/5/00), .
  • State v. Ray 961 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    2d Cir.1983), writ denied
  • Custom-Bilt Cabinet v. Quality Built Cab. 748 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    2d Cir. 1983), writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Wilson 679 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Jasper 677 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Parker 661 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    App. 2 Cir.1987), writ denied writ denied
  • State v. George 652 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    2d Cir.1983), writ denied, (La.App.
  • State v. Brooks 633 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    3d Cir.), writ denied, (La.
  • Horton v. McCrary 620 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    App. 3rd Cir.1983), writ denied
  • State v. Thom 615 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
    2 Cir. 1983), writ denied, (La.
  • Benoit v. Fleet Finance, Inc. 602 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    2d Cir.), writ denied, cert.
  • Morris v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. 582 So. 2d 1349 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    App.2d Cir.), writ denied, (La.
  • Penalber v. Blount 550 So. 2d 577 La. 1989
    2d Cir.1983), writ den., cert.
  • State v. Davis 550 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    2d Cir.1983), writ denied
  • State v. Hallal 544 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    2d Cir.1983), writ denied, (not suggestive where defendant clean shaven and others have some facial hair).
  • Cherrington v. Gardner 541 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
    2nd Cir.), writ denied cert.
  • State v. Hill 534 So. 2d 1296 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    2d Cir.1983), writ den., State v. Hattaway, 180 La.
  • State v. Dugas 527 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    3 Cir.1983), writ den., this court upheld the maximum two and one-half years at hard labor for attempted distribution of a counterfeit dangerous substance.
  • State v. Dugas 527 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    App. 3 Cir.1983), writ den., this court upheld the maximum two and one-half years at hard labor for attempted distribution of a counterfeit dangerous substance.
  • State v. Williams 524 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    2d Cir.1983), writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Hymes 513 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    4th Cir.1983), writ denied, this Court held that the use of a conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, LSA-R.S.
  • State v. Cotton 511 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    2d Cir.1983), writ denied
  • State v. Harris 511 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    4th Cir.1983), writ denied was wrongly decided and should be overruled since it conflicts with the Supreme Court’s (La
  • State v. Burns 504 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    2d Cir.1983), writ denied
  • State v. Barnes 503 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    4th Cir.1983), writ denied, which allowed the enhancement of a sentence for a possession of heroin conviction based on a previous conviction of R.S.
  • Dier v. Hamilton 501 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    App. 2d Cir.1983), writ den.
  • State v. Davis 499 So. 2d 1311 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    4th Cir.1983); writ denied
  • State v. Farmer 497 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    3rd Cir.1983), writ denied
  • State v. Wallace 484 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    2nd Cir.1983), Writ denied
  • State v. O'Meara 479 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    2 Cir.1983), writ denied, (La.App.
  • State v. Lewis 478 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    2d Cir.1983), writ denied
  • State v. Buie 477 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    2nd Cir. 1983), writ denied, where the court held that an identification procedure is reliable if the following factors are met: "1) the opportunity of the witness to view the criminal at the time of the crime; 2) the witness' degree of attention; 3) the accuracy of the witness' prior description of the criminal; 4) the witness' degree
  • State v. Kinkade 470 So. 2d 442 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    3rd Cir.1983), writ denied
  • C & v. GRAVEL, INC. v. MacO Const. Corp. 465 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    2d Cir.1983), writ denied (La.
  • State v. McLeland 456 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    App. 2d Cir.1983), writ denied
  • State v. Robertson 454 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    2d Cir.1983), writ denied
  • State v. Andrews 451 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    2nd Cir.1983), writ denied, (1983), where the court held that an identification procedure is reliable if the following factors are met: 1) the opportunity of the witness to view the criminal at the time of the crime; 2) the witness' degree of attention; 3) the accuracy of the witness' prior description of the criminal; 4) the witness' degree of