Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brown, 451 So. 2d 1074.

25 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Lynn Cooley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
La. 2020
art. 922(B) applied, (La.
State Of Louisiana v. David Young La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State Of Louisiana v. Nicholas Revish La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Broussard 269 So. 3d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
532(7), 581 ; see also State v. Brown , , 1079 (La.1984) ; State v. Taylor , ; State v. Walgamotte
State of Louisiana v. Damon Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Robinson 167 So. 3d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
5 Cir. 10/9/13), ; Griffin , 13-701 at 3, 138 So.3d at 91 ; accord, (holding that once a case is appealed, the trial court is without jurisdiction to entertain a motion for new trial unless the case is remanded to that court for that purpose).
State v. Brady 131 So. 3d 166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Rome, 93-1221, pp. 3-4 (La.1/14/94), (
State v. Daniels 128 So. 3d 349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
232 , 66 L.Ed.2d 106 (1980)
State v. Johnson 128 So. 3d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
art. 916 1 ; accord, (holding that once a case is appealed, the trial court is without jurisdiction to entertain a motion for a new trial unless the case is remanded to that court for that purpose).
State of Louisiana v. C.W. W. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Sorden 45 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See State v. Rome, 93-1221 (La.1/14/94), -1287 ; State v. Walgamotte, supra
State v. Guerin 973 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Brocato 744 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
In Bennett , the court wrote: Article 582 and State v. Brown, [ ], state that the one year for retrial runs from the finality of the judgment granting defendant a new trial.
State v. Campbell 715 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Barley 698 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
art. 582 permit the institution of prosecution at this point.
State v. Harris 694 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Williams 631 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Rome 630 So. 2d 1284 La. 1994
State v. Rome 616 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Cited in support of this *1364 in which the supreme court ruled that the one-year period to commence a new trial began the date the new trial was granted and not on the date the judgment of the appellate court was filed and executed in the office of the clerk in the district court.
State v. Bennett 610 So. 2d 120 La. 1992
this court interpreted Article 582 to mean that the one year begins to run from the date when the order for a new trial "becomes final."
State v. Bennett 592 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Brooks 505 So. 2d 714 La. 1987
State v. Chapman 495 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Whalen 470 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985