Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Perique, 439 So. 2d 1060.
-
State of Louisiana in the Interest of D.T.
La. 2020
s for the exercise of adult jurisdiction over juvenile offenders, stating, “Thus, it can no longer be said that non-criminal treatment of juveniles is the general rule mandated by the constitution, since the constitution now permits the legislature to enact a statute exempting any juvenile arrested for any of the seven enumerated offenses from ‘special juvenile procedures.’” (La.
- State of Louisiana v. Hunter Fussell La. 2019
- State v. ADA 26 So. 3d 154 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
- State v. A.D.A. 26 So. 3d 154 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
- State v. Dixon 712 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
-
In Re CB
708 So. 2d 391
La. 1998
[9] State in the Interest of Hunter, (La.
- In re C.B. 708 So. 2d 391 La. 1998
-
State v. Pilcher
655 So. 2d 636
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
a sixteen year old was arrested and charged with armed robbery.
- State v. Perow 616 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
- State v. Pierre 614 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
- State v. Gachot 609 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
- State v. Payne 482 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
-
State v. Blatcher
452 So. 2d 787
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
The jurisdictional plea — based on defendant’s age of 16 years at the time of the offense —
- State v. Foley 456 So. 2d 979 La. 1984