DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Glass, 455 So. 2d 659.

48 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Jamaria Xavier Randle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    erwise criminal, when “committed through the compulsion of threats by another of death or great bodily harm, and the offender reasonably believes the person making the threats is present and would immediately carry out the threats if the crime were not committed[.]” As clearly reflected within this provision, “the defense of coercion is not available to one charged with murder[.]” cert.
  • State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
    te v. Blank, 04-0204 (La.4/11/07), ; State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), ; State v. Gradley, 97-0641 (La.5/19/98), ; State v. Robertson, 97-0177 (La.3/4/98)
  • State v. Dressner 45 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
    2049 , 85 L.Ed.2d 322 (1985); ce rt.
  • State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
    2049 , 85 L.Ed.2d 322 (1985); cert.
  • State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
    v. Jacobs, 99-1659 (La.6/29/01), ; State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), ; State v. Gradley, 97-0641 (La.5/19/98), ; State v. Robertson, 97-0177 (La.3/4/98)
  • State v. Montejo 974 So. 2d 1238 La. 2008
    2049 , 85 L.Ed.2d 822 (1985); cert.
  • State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
    eath during robbery in their home; victims were 76 and 71); State v. Tart, 92-0772 (La.2/9/96), (defendant bound and repeatedly stabbed elderly couple to death during robbery in their home; victims were 70 and 66); State v. Burrell, supra (defendant shot couple, age 65 and 56, in their home during an armed robbery); (same; co-defendant of Wingo); (defendant strangled an 81-year-old woman in her home during an aggravated rape); (defendant repeatedly stabbed a 74-year-old woman during an armed rob
  • State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
    799 , 112 L.Ed.2d 861 (1991) (defendant shot couple, ages 65 and 56, in their home during an armed robbery); State v. Wingo, supra ; cert.
  • State v. Clark 851 So. 2d 1055 La. 2003
    re 76 and 71); State v. Tart, 92-0772 (La.2/9/96), (defendant bound and repeatedly stabbed elderly couple to death during robbery in their home; victims were 70 and 66); Wingo, (defendant and co-defendant escaped from jail, burglarized the home of an elderly couple, shot each victim in the back of the head, and robbed them, taking their car); (La.
  • State v. Cosey 779 So. 2d 675 La. 2000
    2049 , 85 L.Ed.2d 322 (1985); cert.
  • State v. Miller 776 So. 2d 396 La. 2000
    799 , 112 L.Ed.2d 861 (1991)
  • State v. Casey 775 So. 2d 1022 La. 2000
    2049 , 85 L.Ed.2d 322 (1985); (La.
  • State v. Thibodeaux 750 So. 2d 916 La. 1999
    State v. Sepulvado, 93-2692 (La.4/8/96); ; -68 (La.1984).
  • State v. Edwards 750 So. 2d 893 La. 1999
    2049 , 85 L.Ed.2d 322 (1985) (where double homicide was committed during an armed robbery); cert.
  • State v. Howard 751 So. 2d 783 La. 1999
    799 , 112 L.Ed.2d 861 (1991) (defendant shot couple, age 65 and 56, in their home during an armed robbery); (defendant and co-defendant escaped from jail, burglarized the home of an elderly couple, shot each victim in the back of the head, and robbed them, taking their car); (same; co-defendant of Wingo); (defendant strangled an 81-year-old woman in her home during an aggravated rape); (defendant repeatedly stabbed a 74-year-old woman during an armed robbery in her home).
  • State v. Letulier 750 So. 2d 784 La. 1998
    g an armed robbery); (defendant plotted and laid in wait to steal female minister's car and repeatedly stabbed her after raping her); (defendant and co-defendant escaped from jail, burglarized the home of an elderly couple, shot each victim in the back of the head, and robbed them, taking their car); (same; co-defendant of Wingo); (defendant strangled an 81-year-old woman in her home during an aggravated rape); (defendant repeatedly stabbed a 74-year-old woman during an armed robbery in her home
  • State v. Williams 708 So. 2d 703 La. 1998
    2049 , 85 L.Ed.2d 322 (1985); cert.
  • State v. Robertson 712 So. 2d 8 La. 1998
    [4] *19 That references made during the penalty phase to the possibility of a gubernatorial pardon, although impermissible, cert.
  • State v. Comeaux 699 So. 2d 16 La. 1997
  • State v. Lavalais 685 So. 2d 1048 La. 1996
    For example, we held that the state's cross examination of a defense expert witness on corrections did not interject an arbitrary factor into the proceedings, since the defense had opened the door to the subject.
  • State v. McCartney 684 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Tart 672 So. 2d 116 La. 1996
    2049 , 85 L.Ed.2d 322 (1985) cert.
  • State v. Sepulvado 672 So. 2d 158 La. 1996
    However, we determined that questions asked of a defense witness by the state during cross examination at the penalty phase did not inject an arbitrary factor into the jury's sentencing decision.
  • State v. Sanders 648 So. 2d 1272 La. 1994
  • State v. Jones 639 So. 2d 1144 La. 1994
    2374 , 80 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984); cert.
  • State v. Code 627 So. 2d 1373 La. 1993
    2691 , 86 L.Ed.2d 708 (1985); cert.
  • State v. Joseph 573 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Burrell 561 So. 2d 692 La. 1990
  • State v. Smith 554 So. 2d 676 La. 1989
    3339 , 92 L.Ed.2d 743 (1986); (La.
  • State v. Deboue 552 So. 2d 355 La. 1989
  • State v. Lindsey 543 So. 2d 886 La. 1989
  • State v. Johnson 541 So. 2d 818 La. 1989
    See, (defendant shot five persons in rapid succession); (defendant's multiple victims were shot while sitting at a table); (defendant shot and killed one person in a barroom and immediately fired upon others); (defendants shot victims to death on bed, one after the other); (defendant shot and killed first victim; reloaded; chased second victim down the street and shot her); (two consecu
  • State v. Messiah 538 So. 2d 175 La. 1988
    2049 , 85 L.Ed.2d 322 (1985); cert.
  • State v. Lee 524 So. 2d 1176 La. 1988
  • State v. Perry 502 So. 2d 543 La. 1986
  • State v. Bates 495 So. 2d 1262 La. 1986
    2049 , 85 L.Ed.2d 322 (1985); cert.
  • State v. Clark 492 So. 2d 862 La. 1986
  • State v. Williams 490 So. 2d 255 La. 1986
  • State v. Ford 489 So. 2d 1250 La. 1986
    2049 , 85 L.Ed.2d 322 (1985); cert.
  • State v. Byrne 483 So. 2d 564 La. 1986
  • State v. Williams 480 So. 2d 721 La. 1985
  • State v. Wilson 467 So. 2d 503 La. 1985
  • State v. Rushing 464 So. 2d 268 La. 1985
  • State v. Busby 464 So. 2d 262 La. 1985
  • State v. Washington 461 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    (1983), writ denied, _ U.S. _, 104 S.Ct.
  • State v. Wingo 457 So. 2d 1159 La. 1984
  • State v. Welcome 458 So. 2d 1235 La. 1984
    Webster Parish Date of Crime: December 25, 1982 Glass and codefendant Wingo escaped from the Webster Parish jail, broke into the home of a married couple in their late 50's, tied the victims in their bed, killed them by shooting them in the head, and stole the victims' automobile.
  • State v. Summit 454 So. 2d 1100 La. 1984
    In this case, as in State v. *1112 Narcisse, the jury was presented with an intentional killing during the perpetration of an armed robbery.