Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Tuesno v. Maggio, 441 So. 2d 1226.

15 citing documents.

State v. Fraley 499 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Barnes 496 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Dakin 495 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Polk 494 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Lutz 491 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Duncan 488 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Sparks 483 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
The issue raised by this set of circumstances has been considered by this court en banc, and by majority vote (with all three members of this panel dissenting) the trial court is without jurisdiction to conduct multiple bill proceedings subsequent to entering an order of appeal.
State v. Felton 482 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
By majority vote en banc on this matter, the court chose not to adopt this reasoning and, instead, followed State ex rel, which holds that the court is without jurisdiction to enhance after an order of appeal has been entered.
State v. Garland 482 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Calway 482 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Waldron 482 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
(1983), the Louisiana Supreme Court, held the trial court to be without jurisdiction to impose an enhanced sentence since an order of appeal had been entered prior to the imposition of that enhanced sentence.
State v. Turner 480 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Bruno 482 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Thomas 479 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Tuesno 455 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
On November 28, 1983, the same court set aside his enhanced sentence and reinstated the original fifteen year sentence stating: “The trial court was without jurisdiction to impose an enhanced sentence as an order of appeal had been entered prior to imposition of the enhanced sentence.”