DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Clark, 442 So. 2d 1129.

23 citing documents.

  • State v. Lee 976 So. 2d 109 La. 2008
    120 of 139 potential jurors (86%) possessed some knowledge of the crime, most had only a vague recollection of the surrounding facts); ("Although a majority of prospective jurors ( i.e., 24 of 39 or 62%) admitted exposure to pre-trial publicity, only four (10%) were excused for cause on ground of their formation of a fixed opinion."); (motion for change of venue granted based on dry run voir dire in which 37 of 38 jurors recalled details of crime and only six out of 24 (25%) jurors in the last t
  • State of Louisiana v. Tyrone Davis, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Davis 929 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
    (motion for change of venue granted based on dry run voir dire in which 37 of 38 jurors (97%) recalled details of crime).
  • State v. Clark 851 So. 2d 1055 La. 2003
    A review of the responses by potential jurors on voir dire does not reveal the existence of collective community prejudice which could have denied defendant a fair trial before impartial jurors."); (motion for change of venue granted based on dry run voir dire in which 37 of 38 jurors recalled details of crime and only six out of 24 jurors in the last two groups questioned indicated that their knowledge would not affect their decision); David, 425 So.2d at 1247 (out of 112 jurors, 27 had read or
  • State v. Frank 803 So. 2d 1 La. 2001
    A review of the responses by potential jurors on voir dire does not reveal the existence of collective community prejudice which could have denied defendant a fair trial before impartial jurors."); (motion for change of venue granted based on dry run voir dire in which 37 of 38 jurors recalled details of crime and only six out of 24 jurors in the last two groups questioned indicated that their knowledge would not affect their decision); State v. David, 425 So.2d at 1247 (out of 112 jurors, 27 ha
  • State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
    Compare, (motion for change of venue granted based on dry run voir dire in which thirty-seven of thirty-eight jurors recalled details of crime and only six out of twenty-four jurors in the last two groups questioned indicated that their knowledge would not affect their decision).
  • State v. Coleman 756 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Hundley 760 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    By contrast, in which the Louisiana Supreme Court found that a change of venue should have been granted.
  • State v. Williams 708 So. 2d 703 La. 1998
    Compare, (motion for change of venue granted based on dry run voir dire in which 37 of 38 jurors recalled details of crime and only 6 out of 24 jurors in the last two groups questioned indicated their knowledge would not affect their decision).
  • State v. Edmondson 699 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    -1134 (La.1983); -118 (La.1983); (La.
  • State v. Connolly 700 So. 2d 810 La. 1997
  • State v. Hart 691 So. 2d 651 La. 1997
  • State v. Hattaway 674 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    State v. McLemore, supra.
  • State v. Huls 676 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. McLemore 640 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Griffin 618 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Thom 615 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Moseley 587 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Lee 559 So. 2d 1310 La. 1990
    Media publicity will not require a change of venue unless the "`trial atmosphere' has been `utterly corrupted by press coverage.'"
  • State v. Walters 514 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Comeaux 514 So. 2d 84 La. 1987
  • State v. Williams 458 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984