Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Godden v. Executors of Burke, 35 La. Ann. 160.

6 citing documents.

  • Succession of Patterson 22 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
    Chandler v. Barrett, supra; .
  • Succession of Heinemann 136 So. 51 La. 1931
    366, 369; ; Succession of Ford, 151 La.
  • Succession of Ledet 128 So. 273 La. 1930
    Godden v. Burke’s Ex’rs, .
  • Succession of Schlumbrecht 70 So. 76 La. 1915
    458 , , and quotes from the original opinion in the case last mentioned to the effect that article 1492 of our Code was not intended “to prevent the admission of proof to establish the circumstances which transpire at the making of an authentic will, under charges tending to the nullity of the act for want of compliance wit
  • Succession of McDermott 66 So. 546 La. 1914
    The Godden Case, affirms Landry v. Tomatis, and further holds that a memorandum prepared by his counsel may be read to the testator by one of the witnesses.
  • Succession of Jones 45 So. 965 La. 1907