Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Godden v. Executors of Burke, 35 La. Ann. 160.
-
Succession of Patterson
22 So. 2d 214
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
Chandler v. Barrett, supra; .
-
Succession of Heinemann
136 So. 51
La. 1931
366, 369; ; Succession of Ford, 151 La.
-
Succession of Ledet
128 So. 273
La. 1930
Godden v. Burke’s Ex’rs, .
-
Succession of Schlumbrecht
70 So. 76
La. 1915
458 , , and quotes from the original opinion in the case last mentioned to the effect that article 1492 of our Code was not intended “to prevent the admission of proof to establish the circumstances which transpire at the making of an authentic will, under charges tending to the nullity of the act for want of compliance wit
-
Succession of McDermott
66 So. 546
La. 1914
The Godden Case, affirms Landry v. Tomatis, and further holds that a memorandum prepared by his counsel may be read to the testator by one of the witnesses.
- Succession of Jones 45 So. 965 La. 1907