Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Louisiana Resources Co. v. Greene, 406 So. 2d 1360.

22 citing documents.

Bayou Bridge Pipeline, LLC v. 38.00 Acres, More or Less, Located in St. Martin Parish La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
145, (1970), in which this court found a public purpose where a plant produced propane from the raw stream it received from area producers and where “the effect of the new line will be to transport large quantities of propane gas from the plant to 20 a large market in several states.” Likewise, (La.App.
Eric Mark Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
3 Cir.), writ denied, (La.App.
Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 262 So. 3d 936 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
3 Cir.), writ denied , ; *948 Louisiana Resources Co. v. Greene , (La.App.
Enterprise Te Products Pipeline Co., LLC v. Rosalyn Marie Davis Patin Avila La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University v. Boudreaux's Tire & Auto Repair, L.L.C. 133 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See, e.g., Chanse Gas Corp., 34,958, 34,959, p. 22 (La.App.2d Cir.8/22/01), 794 So.2d at 977 ; (La.App.
State v. Miss Chub, L.L.C. 92 So. 3d 422 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
ExxonMobil Pipeline Co. v. Union Pacific Railroad 35 So. 3d 192 La. 2010
Similarly, in finding a public purpose for a proposed pipeline that connected to a (La.App.
Exxonmobil Pipeline Co. v. Union Pacific Railroad 15 So. 3d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Criticized City of Shreveport v. Chanse Gas Corp. 794 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Exxon Pipeline Co. v. LeBlanc 763 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Faustina Pipe Line Co. v. Romero 499 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
As we stated in Louisiana Resources Co. v. Greene, et al, (La.App.
Hospital Service Dist. No. 1 v. Guillot 482 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Terrebonne Parish Police Jury v. Kelly 472 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
STATE, THROUGH DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. v. Townsend 473 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development v. Townsend 473 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
VALLEY ELEC. MEMBERSHIP CORP., INC. v. Wallace 465 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Wilson v. State, Dept. of Transportation & Development 464 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Faustina Pipe Line Co. v. Broussard 450 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Southwest Louisiana Electric Membership Corp. v. Hargrave 432 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Pillow v. Board of Com'rs 425 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Louisiana Resources Co. v. Greene 412 So. 2d 84 La. 1982
Louisiana Resources Co. v. Noel 406 So. 2d 1373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
For the reasons stated in the companion case of Louisiana Resources Company v. Karlan P. Greene, et al., , number 8389 on the docket of this court in which a separate decision is being rendered this date, the judgment of the district court in the present case is amended to conform to the opinion rendered in the companion case referred to above relative to the award of the fees of expert witnesses Murry Ma-yard, J. F. Noe