Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite La. State Bar Ass'n v. Hinrichs, 486 So. 2d 116.
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Williams 512 So. 2d 404 La. 1987
-
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Klein
511 So. 2d 1137
La. 1987
(1986) this court established factual standards to guide itself in selecting the proper sanction for an attorney found guilty of violating DR 9-102 in mishandling his client's funds.
-
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Elbert
512 So. 2d 398
La. 1987
the appropriate sanction for Elbert’s misconduct would be a suspension of one to three years.
-
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Pugh
508 So. 2d 1350
La. 1987
we conclude that an official public reprimand would be the appropriate disciplinary action for respondent's conduct in these matters and that respondent be required to pay $18,000 in unearned legal fees to Aeropulse Exploration Services, Inc. and $250 to Ms. Trumps.
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Thalheim 504 So. 2d 822 La. 1987
-
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Schmidt
506 So. 2d 1186
La. 1987
we agree with the recommendation of the commissioner, concurred in by the committee, that respondent should be disbarred.
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Krasnoff 502 So. 2d 1018 La. 1987
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Stewart 500 So. 2d 360 La. 1987
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Hinrichs 495 So. 2d 943 La. 1986
-
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Williams
498 So. 2d 727
La. 1986
of Incorp., Art. XV, §§ 5, 6 and 8; (La.
-
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Simons
495 So. 2d 936
La. 1986
we consider that disbarment is the appropriate penalty under the circumstances of this case.
-
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Alker
491 So. 2d 1328
La. 1986
outlined the typical elements in such a case: "...
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Krasnoff 488 So. 2d 1002 La. 1986
-
Explained
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Robinson
485 So. 2d 501
La. 1986
we explained the disciplinary rule prohibiting a lawyer from commingling or mishandling client funds.