Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Darville v. Texaco, Inc., 447 So. 2d 473.

138 citing documents.

Boubel v. Gilardi 532 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Darville v. Texaco, Inc., (La.
Bishop v. Callais 533 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Darville v. Texaco, Inc.
Dazet v. French Market Homestead 533 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Bordelon v. Cochrane 533 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Darville v. Texaco, Inc.
Becnel v. Madere 535 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
In Darville v. Texaco, Inc., -75 (La.1984) our Louisiana Supreme Court stated: The purpose of an exception of no cause of action is to determine the sufficiency in law of the petition.
Cost v. St. Landry Parish School Bd. 528 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Darville v. Texaco, Inc.
Tortorich v. Neese Enterprises, Inc. 528 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., (La.App.
Joseph v. Cannon 526 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Darville v. Texaco, Inc.
Opelousas Scrap Materials, Inc. v. STATE, FOSTER HOMES PROGRAM 525 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Darville v. Texaco, Inc.
Laper v. Board of Com'rs 523 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Darville v. Texaco, Inc.
Sunlake Apartment Residents v. Tonti Development Corp. 522 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
The Louisiana Supreme Court defined the exception of no cause of action in Darville v. Texaco, Inc., (La.
Shaw v. Everett 582 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Brannan v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc. 516 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Darville v. Texaco, Inc.
Saxena v. Saxena 518 So. 2d 1098 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
[emphasis supplied] See also Darville v. Texaco, Inc., (La.App.
Engrum v. Boise Southern Company 512 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Darville v. Texaco, Inc., (La.
LaRue v. Crown Zellerbach Corp. 512 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Darville v. Texaco, Inc.
Dickens v. Auvil 508 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Darville v. Texaco, Incorporated, Lewis, supra.
Parker v. Succession of Gauthier 508 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
art. 927; Darville v. Texaco, Inc., writ denied .
Smith v. Allstate Insurance Co. 506 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
art. 931 and Darville v. Texaco, Inc., and requested dismissal of the exception.
Hong v. Lucien 505 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Darville v. Texaco, Inc.
Zeagler v. Town of Jena 503 So. 2d 1137 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Darville v. Texaco, Inc.
Williams v. Charity Hosp. of Louisiana 499 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Darville v. Texaco, Inc.
Lewis v. Willamette Industries, Inc. 499 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Darville v. Texaco, Inc.
In re Caceres 491 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Darville v. Texaco, Inc.
Latter & Blum, Inc. v. AJ Warehouse, Inc. 487 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Darville v. Texaco, Inc., (La.
Guzzetta v. Texas Pipe Line Co. 485 So. 2d 508 La. 1986
927, Darville v. Texaco, Inc., (La.
Mitchell v. Crane 485 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Darville v. Texaco, Inc.
Bourgeois v. Medical Center of East New Orleans 482 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
(6) Should plaintiffs have been given an opportunity to amend their petition?” In Darville v. Texaco, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court briefly summarized the general rules dealing with exceptions of no cause of action: “The purpose of an exception of no cause of action is to determine the sufficiency in law of the petition.
Litomisky v. St. Charles High School 482 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Darville v. Texaco, Inc.
Ermert v. Hartford Ins. Co. 480 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Darville v. Texaco, Inc.
Bank of St. Charles v. Eris 477 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Darville v. Texaco, Inc.
Northwest Insurance v. Carpenters District Council of New Orleans & Vicinity 470 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Northwest Ins. Co. v. CARPENTERS DIST. COUNCIL OF NEW ORLEANS 470 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Lewis v. Lewis 469 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Darville v. Texaco, Inc.
Cheramie v. Vegas 468 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
The peremptory exception raising the objection of no cause of action tests the sufficiency of the petition in law, Darville v. Texaco, Inc., is triable solely on the allegations of plaintiffs' petition, (La.App.
Perez v. State Farm Ins. Companies 458 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Article 927; Darville *220 v. Texaco, Incorporated and XYZ Insurance Co.
Darville v. Texaco, Inc. 448 So. 2d 1302 La. 1984
In re Doris Marie Darville, et al., applying for reconsideration of writ granted with order on March 9, 1984, , to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 83-CA-365; Parish of St.
Darville v. Texaco, Inc. 448 So. 2d 1302 La. 1984
In re Maryland Casualty Company, applying for reconsideration of writ granted with order on March 9, 1984, , to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 83-CA-365; Parish of St.