DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Turner v. Turner, 455 So. 2d 1374.

116 citing documents.

  • Guillory v. LaFleur 469 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • Brooks v. Brooks 469 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • Dominick v. Dominick 470 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    The Supreme Court, said: "This presumption has caused some confusion.
  • Sharp v. Sharp 470 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • Martinez v. Martinez 470 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    *376 (La.1984); LSA-C.C.
  • Distinguished Juckett v. Woods 469 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    in support of her position.
  • Doyle v. Doyle 465 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • Fusilier v. Fusilier 464 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • Goldman v. Logue 461 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
  • Black v. Black 460 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • Roberts v. Roberts 460 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • Rutland v. Rutland 460 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    (La.1984), decided September 10, 1984, the Louisiana Supreme Court again reaffirmed the best interest standard as the sole criterion to be used by trial courts in making custody awards.
  • Turner v. Turner 459 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • Smith v. Smith 459 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    The mother correctly, asserts that the amended art. 146 establishes only a rebuttable presumption that joint custody is in the best interest of the child, and that that presumption is overcome by evidence to its contrary.
  • Donaldson v. Keller 459 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    “(3) For the purpose of assisting the court in making a determination whether an award of joint custody is appropriate, the court may direct that an investigation be conducted.” In a decision handed down by the Louisiana Supreme Court, on September 10,1984, rehearing denied, the Court applied the guidelines contained in article 146(C)(2)(a)-(¿), even though the effective date of the amendment was after the judgment under review, dated April 27, 1983.
  • Long v. Long 458 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    we agree with appellant that joint custody was not the wisest custodial arrangement given the circumstances of this case, and we set aside that order.