Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Steele v. Denning, 456 So. 2d 992.

13 citing documents.

Jerlyn Ann Burton v. Anthony D. Belt, James K. Belt and Myra L. Belt La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
In Louisiana, “[p]roperty may be held in indivision and owned jointly (in common) by more than one person; each person owns an interest in the whole and does not own any particular part.” Tucker, 506 So.2d at 732 ( (La.
Succession of Lucille Watts Patin, Pamela Sue Patin Quantz, Charleen Patin Taylor, Rebel Kelley Caplinger, Denis Curtin Kelley, … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
Carolyn Plummer Sheridan v. Tommy Gordon Cassel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
App. 2 Cir. 1984), writ granted affirmed
Lacassane Co. v. Jardin Minerals Co. 847 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
|9The relationship between the Mineral Code and the Civil Code, described above
Campbell v. Pasternack Holding Co., Inc. 625 So. 2d 477 La. 1993
Frey v. Amoco Production Co. 603 So. 2d 166 La. 1992
Horton v. Mobley 578 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Fuselier v. Estate of Peschier 525 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Amoco Production Co. v. Thompson 516 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
appears the following: It is well settled that property may be held in indivision, that is, it may be owned jointly by more than one person, with no single person owning any particular part of the property, rather, each owning an interest in the whole.
Tucker v. Kelly 506 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Texaco v. Newton & Rosa Smith Charitable Trust 471 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Cahn v. Cahn 468 So. 2d 1176 La. 1985
This principle was grounded in Roman law and held in French law, as observed by our Court in Gulf Refining Co., supra
Broussard v. Guidry 464 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Art. 1289; Smith v. Nelson, 121 La.