Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc., 457 So. 2d 646.
-
Phillips v. City of New Orleans
116 So. 3d 823
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc.
- Brock v. Singleton 65 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
- Boxie v. Smith-Ruffin 979 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
-
Evans v. Waste Management of New Orleans
904 So. 2d 38
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
In Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court said that “[t]he diagnosis and opinion of the treating physician are entitled to more weight than those of doctors examining the plaintiff for consultation for litigation purposes only.” In the instant case, however, Dr. Bourgeois was not simply examining Mr. Davis for consu
-
Hood v. Metro Industrial Corp.
806 So. 2d 848
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc.
-
Hatcherson v. Diebold, Inc.
773 So. 2d 821
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
It is clear under Loui *826 siana law that “[t]he diagnosis and opinions of treating physicians are entitled to more weight than those doctors examining the plaintiff for litigation purposes only.” Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc.
-
Ben v. HOLTRACHEM INC.
772 So. 2d 326
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc.
-
Daugherty v. Domino's Pizza
674 So. 2d 947
La. 1996
See, e.g., Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc.
-
Guidry v. Maison DeVille Nursing Home
672 So. 2d 381
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc.
-
Dull v. Gibbs
577 So. 2d 806
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc., on remand, (La.App.
-
Brown v. J. Manoco, Inc.
555 So. 2d 29
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc., on remand, (La.App.
-
Menard v. Multi-Service Corp.
546 So. 2d 952
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc., '
-
Williams v. Kirk's Tire & Performance
546 So. 2d 874
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc., Sino v. Chalmette General Hospital, Inc., (La.App.
-
Hurd v. Employers Casualty Co./Employers National Insurance Co.
517 So. 2d 494
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
“A claimant in a worker’s compensation proceeding bears the burden of proving to a legal certainty and by a reasonable preponderance of the evidence the nature and extent of his disability.” Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc.
-
Mazoch v. Employers Cas. Co.
514 So. 2d 1184
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc.
-
Menendez v. Continental Ins. Co.
515 So. 2d 525
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
However, the Supreme Court reversed that decision in Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc., and restated the general rule without qualifying it.
-
White v. Eagle Welding & Fabrication, Inc.
509 So. 2d 194
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Jaecle v. Dresser Industries, Inc.
- Simmons v. FORD, BACON & DAVIS CONST. 506 So. 2d 1300 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
-
Alexander v. LaGrange
509 So. 2d 540
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc.
-
Lang Pham v. Delta Petroleum Co., Inc.
503 So. 2d 149
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc.
-
Lewis v. Piccadilly, Inc.
489 So. 2d 984
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc., (La.
-
Sino v. CHALMETTE GENERAL HOSP., INC.
489 So. 2d 311
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Jacobs v. Pik-Quick, Inc., (La.App.
-
Matherne v. Gold Crest Cleaners, Inc.
486 So. 2d 943
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc., Schoest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., , (La.1982).
- Brown v. Brook Tarpaulin Co. of New Orleans 485 So. 2d 994 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
-
Chaney v. Harvest Manor Nursing Home
468 So. 2d 846
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc.
-
Campbell v. Luke Const. Co.
465 So. 2d 688
La. 1985
Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc.
-
Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc.
465 So. 2d 65
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc.
-
Hayes v. Commercial Union Assur. Co.
459 So. 2d 1245
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
1st Cir.1972); Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc., at 648 (La.1984).