Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Snider v. Murray, 461 So. 2d 1051.
-
Roy Weldon v. Monica Curry
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-1- the Louisiana Supreme Court resolved an earlier conflict among the Louisiana Courts of Appeal regarding the application of Louisiana law to UM coverage.
-
Weldon v. Curry
899 So. 2d 101
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
the Louisiana Supreme Court resolved an earlier conflict among the Louisiana Courts of Appeal regarding the application of Louisiana law to UM coverage.
-
Champagne v. Ward
893 So. 2d 773
La. 2005
this court addressed the issue of whether Louisiana's UM law could be applied to a foreign insurance policy covering a vehicle registered in a foreign state.
- Rains v. Jones 890 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
-
Zuviceh v. Nationwide Ins. Co.
786 So. 2d 340
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
LEGISLATIVE AND JURISPRUDENTIAL PERSPECTIVE In 1985, to resolve a conflict among the Louisiana Courts of Appeal regarding the application of Louisiana law on UM coverage.
- Adams v. Thomason 753 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
- Anderson v. Oliver 705 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
-
Minor v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange
700 So. 2d 951
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
2nd Cir.1984), reversed in part on other grounds, was close to the insured vehicle in time and space, the court distinguished Day and found, "[h]e had no legal or physical relationship" with the insured vehicle.
-
Trautman v. Poor
685 So. 2d 516
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
the Louisiana Supreme Court decided to address the disagreement by avoiding it altogether.
- Bell v. Farmer's Ins. Group 635 So. 2d 1305 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
-
Reeves v. Allstate Ins. Co.
619 So. 2d 202
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State Farm argues, in defense of the trial court's judgment, which interpreted LSA-R.S.
-
Willett v. NATIONAL FIRE & MAR. INS. CO.
594 So. 2d 966
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Allstate moved for summary judgment, relying on its policy, New Hampshire law, (La.
-
Byrne v. State Farm Insurance Co.
572 So. 2d 728
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
2nd Cir.1984), reversed in *730 part on other grounds, the court stated that merely because the impact of the other vehicle propelled the plaintiff into the insured vehicle, its uninsured motorist policy did not apply since the plaintiff was not in, entering into, alighting from, or upon the vehicle.
- McLemore v. Fox 565 So. 2d 1031 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
- Schwoch v. Sutor 559 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
-
Williams v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS.
524 So. 2d 851
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Urging reversal, (La.App.
- Ark-La-Tex Timber Co. v. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. 516 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
-
Roger v. Estate of Moulton
513 So. 2d 1126
La. 1987
22:1406(D)(1)(a) did mandate UM coverage
- Roger v. Estate of Moulton 494 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
-
Washington v. Allstate Ins. Co.
499 So. 2d 1255
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
2nd Cir.1984), reversed in part on other grounds, Snider's truck was pulled out of the mud by another truck which was connected by a 20 foot chain.
- Beasley v. Butler 499 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
-
Martinez v. Great American Ins. Co.
499 So. 2d 364
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
2nd Cir.1984), reversed on other grounds
- Donnelly v. Greyhound Rent-A-Car 490 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
-
Sumrall v. McNeese
476 So. 2d 531
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
the Louisiana Supreme Court observed as follows: [E]ven if Louisiana law is the choice of laws to be applied, the only Louisiana law which requires underinsured motorist coverage in the amount of the bodily injury liability limits is La.R.S.
- George v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 471 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
-
Cobb v. Burke
469 So. 2d 1221
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
the court was faced with a very similar factual situation.
-
Bloodworth v. Carroll
463 So. 2d 1313
La. 1985
decided January 14, 1985.
-
Bloodworth v. Carroll
463 So. 2d 1313
La. 1985
decided January 14, 1985.
-
Decatur v. United States Fidelity & Guar. Co.
464 So. 2d 854
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
NOTES [1] Since this opinion has been decided, we have become aware of the Supreme Court case of Snider v. Murray, et al., (1985), which case, we believe, validates our conclusions herein.