DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Charbonnet v. Gerace, 457 So. 2d 676.

82 citing documents.

  • Johnson v. Office of Employment Security 536 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • Ford v. Patin 534 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • Braggs v. Adm'r, La. Office of Emp. SEC. 535 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    Pilgrim Manor Nursing Home, (La.App.
  • Romano v. Whitfield 535 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    that “[b]ecause of the beneficial purpose of unemployment compensation, the term misconduct should be construed so as to favor the awarding of benefits rather than disqualification.” The Louisiana Employment Security Law is remedial in nature and, as such, should be interpreted by the Court to extend i
  • Herbert v. Blanche 535 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • Sledge v. Whitfield 531 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    Harris v. Administrator, Louisiana Office of Employment Security, writ denied
  • Collins v. Whitfield 525 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • Eugene v. Adm'r, Div. of Emp. SEC. 525 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
  • Dipol v. ADM'R, OFFICE OF EMP. SEC. OF LA. DEPT. OF LABOR 526 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • Joseph v. Blache 525 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • Joiner v. Louisiana Department of Labor Employment 525 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    23:1634: “In any [judicial review] proceedings under this section, the findings of the Board of Review as to the facts, if supported by sufficient evidence and in the absence of fraud, shall be conclusive, and the jurisdiction of the court shall be confined to questions of law ...” In summary we find no manifest error, no fraud and that there is sufficient evidence in the record before us to affirm the trial court judgment as rendered except for the costs which were assigned to the claimant, Joi
  • Pope v. Whitfield 524 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    where a strike by FAA air traffic controllers was found not willful because they were justified in believing a strike was authorized by their collective bargaining agreement; (La.
  • McClodden v. Gerace 522 So. 2d 1379 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • Associated Catholic Charities of New Orleans, Inc. v. Repath 522 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • Brister v. Whitfield 522 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • Lowery v. Whitfield 521 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    [] Subsequent appeal court decisions have also stated: the element of intentional wrongdoing must be present for an employee to be guilty of wrongdoing.
  • Canty v. Administrator of Louisiana Office of Employment Security 517 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    stated: For a claimant to be disqualified from benefits because of “misconduct connected with his employment” under La.R.S.
  • Gunn v. Gerace 516 So. 2d 1180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • Dupont v. Blanche 514 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • Weber v. Whitfield 511 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    Misconduct on the part of an employee, as contemplated in the unemployment compensation statute, should be determined by the nature of the violation with due consideration of the factors which enter into the proper conduct of the employer’s work and business rather than determined upon the basis of the numbe
  • Wesley v. Whitfield 508 So. 2d 968 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • Collins v. Blache 509 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    the ‘misconduct’ must have resulted from willful or wanton disregard of the employer’s interest, from a deliberate violation of the employer’s rules, or from a direct disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has the right to expect from his employees.”
  • Causin v. Blache 498 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    23:1601(2) that a worker shall be disqualified for benefits because of “misconduct connected with his employment.” set out the criteria for such misconduct at 678: For a claimant to be disqualified from benefits because of ‘misconduct connected with his employment’ under La.R.S.
  • Jacquet v. Consolidated Companies, Inc. 499 So. 2d 1002 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    As the Louisiana Supreme *1004 for a claimant to be disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits because of `misconduct connected with his employment', the misconduct must have resulted from willful or wanton disregard of the employer's interests, from a deliberate violation of the employer's rules, or from a direct disregard of sta
  • Flagg v. State, Department of Employment Security 494 So. 2d 1305 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • Mascair v. Blache 493 So. 2d 571 La. 1986
    it now contends the labor dispute and resultant disqualification ended, in point of law, when Jefferson Downs filled the open positions with other workers and refused to engage in further negotiations.
  • Popularas v. Department of Labor, Office of Employment Security 488 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • Roberts v. Blache 488 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • Thomas v. Blache 488 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • Pixley v. Blache 488 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • Dubuclet v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SEC. OF DEPT. OF LABOR 483 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • Harris v. ADMINISTRATOR, LOUISIANA OFFICE OF EMPLOYMENT SEC. 480 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985