Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Thomas v. Missouri Pacific RR Co., 466 So. 2d 1280.

56 citing documents.

Maldonado v. Kiewit Louisiana Co. 152 So. 3d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
the supreme court noted: “When a jury is given incorrect instructions in the law, or when a trial court makes a consequential error in the exclusion of evidence, no 1 ^weight should be accorded the judgment of the trial court which implements the jury verdict.” ( Otto v. State Farm Mut.
Campo v. Correa 828 So. 2d 502 La. 2002
Co., ), we have not always chosen to conduct a de novo review of the record.
Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern RR 786 So. 2d 682 La. 2001
Co., we prefer that the court of appeal perform the first appellate review of the damage award.
Nicholas v. Allstate Ins. Co. 765 So. 2d 1017 La. 2000
Co., ), we have not always chosen to conduct a de novo review of the record.
Bernard v. Ferrellgas, Inc. 689 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Boutte v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 674 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Brown v. Diamond Shamrock, Inc. 671 So. 2d 1049 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Martinez v. Schumpert Medical Center, 27,000 (La.App.
Martinez v. Schumpert Medical Center 655 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Quick v. Murphy Oil Co. 643 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
["Conduct is a cause in fact of harm to another if it was a substantial factor in bringing about that harm."]; ["but for" test applied to determine cause in fact]; (La.App.
Jones v. Merritt 633 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Johnson v. Union Pacific Railroad 626 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Graham v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co. 619 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Co., at 1286 (La.1985), and cases cited therein.
Joseph v. Cannon 609 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Donaldson v. UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING, OF MAPLEWOOD, INC. 606 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
1st Cir.1987), writ denied
Girard v. Price 606 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
3rd Cir.1984), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds
Sneed v. Satcher 597 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Rogers v. Parish of East Baton Rouge 577 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Wheeler v. New Orleans Public Service Inc. 573 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Because he maintains trial court error in admitting the depositions, improper jury instructions and confusion by the jury in rendering its verdict, Wheeler argues that the manifest error standard is inapplicable and that this court must make an independent review of the record and determine a preponderance of the evidence, citing among other cases, in support of his position.
Lee v. Missouri Pacific R. Co. 566 So. 2d 1052 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
*1055 Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 260 La.
Percle v. Oubre 564 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
They cite two cases in particular as support for their position that the verdict and judgment herein should be disregarded, (La.
Buckbee v. United Gas Pipe Line Co. Inc. 561 So. 2d 76 La. 1990
Co., we prefer that the court of appeal perform the first appellate review of the entire record under the correct rule of law.
Lucas v. Acker 560 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
W.B. McCartney Oil Co. v. Hataway 544 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
ulting: ⅜ ⅝ ⅜ 5⅜ ⅜ He (2) From omitting to mention in their certificates one or several acts existing on their registers, unless in this latter case the error proceeds from a want of exactness in the description, which can not be imputed to them_” In determining tort liability the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the proper inquiry under a as follows: “To establish a defendant’s liability and recover tort damages, the plaintiff must be able to answer affirmatively the following questions: 1) di
Bordelon v. Jackson 542 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Pool v. Missouri Pacific RR Co. 541 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Lee v. Missouri Pacific RR Co. 540 So. 2d 287 La. 1989
Neff v. Rose 546 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Daigle v. Coastal Marine, Inc.
Wright v. US Gypsum Co. 538 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Dean v. Nunez 534 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Carlin v. Blanchard 537 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Slay v. Quarles Drilling Co. 534 So. 2d 1300 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Highlands Ins. Co. v. Missouri Pacific RR Co. 532 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
3rd Cir.1984), affirmed in part and reversed in part, on other grounds
Pritchard v. Safeco Ins. Co. 529 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Casey v. Southern Baptist Hosp. 526 So. 2d 1332 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Keyworth v. Southern Baptist Hospitals, Inc. 524 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Francioni v. Rault 518 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
Fields v. Gulf Oil Co. 517 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
Schwamb v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. 516 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Kyle v. City of Bogalusa 506 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Prosser and Keeton, The Law of Torts, § 37 pp. 235-238 (5th ed. 1984).
Brownell v. Dietz Motor Lines 503 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Landry v. Fickling 498 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Bourgeois v. Lake Development Corp. 498 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
McLean v. Hunter 495 So. 2d 1298 La. 1986
Ryland v. LAW FIRM OF TAYLOR, PORTER, BROOKS & PHILLIPS 496 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Phillips v. Roy 494 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Lee v. Great Southwest Fire Ins. Co. 493 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Eldridge v. Downtowner Hotel 492 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Lucey v. Harris 490 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Rodriguez v. Traylor 481 So. 2d 1017 La. 1986
Armand v. La. Power & Light Co. 482 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986