Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Tullier v. Tullier, 464 So. 2d 278.

47 citing documents.

Yachet McLauren Versus Carmiko Dixon McLauren La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
Thomas Handy, Jr. Versus The Parish of Jefferson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
Estate of Hebert D. Goss, Jr., AKA Charles Goss v. Estate of Bette Marie Beeson Goos La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
he double declaration rule” which had provided an unrebuttable presumption that immovable property conveyed to a husband during his marriage was community property “unless there is contained in the act of acquisition a double declaration that the property was acquired with funds belonging to the husband separately and that it was being acquired for his individual estate.” (La.
Estate of Goss v. Estate of Goss 187 So. 3d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
ed the double declaration rule” which had provided an unrebuttable presumption that immovable property conveyed to a husband during his marriage was community property “unless there is contained in the act of acquisition a double declaration that the property was acquired with funds belonging to the husband separately and that it was being acquired for his individual estate.”
Church Mutual Insurance Co. v. Dardar 145 So. 3d 271 La. 2014
In re Office of Chief Justice, Louisiana Supreme Court 101 So. 3d 9 La. 2012
provisions into statutes where the legislature has chosen not to do so.”); (“The judicial branch of government merely interprets ...
In Re Succession of Firmin 38 So. 3d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Sanders v. Sanders 961 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
“The party asserting the separate nature of the property acquired during the marriage has the burden of overcoming a strong presumption in favor of the community.”
Succession of Andrew M. Moore La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Succession of Moore 946 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
In Re Succession of Hebert 887 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Talbot v. Talbot 864 So. 2d 590 La. 2003
Hano v. Latino 868 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State Civil Service Commission v. Director of the Department of Public Safety 849 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
While it is undeniably true that “[t]he decisions of our state courts do not create or eliminate substantive rights as this is the proper function of the legislature,” when this court interprets legislative acts, it is giving meaning in particular cases to what the legislature has enacted as law; it is saying what the law is.
Marmino v. City of Crowley 829 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Bourgeois v. AP Green Industries, Inc. 783 So. 2d 1251 La. 2001
While it is undeniably true that "[t]he decisions of our state courts do not create or eliminate substantive rights as this is the proper function of the legislature," when this court interprets legislative acts, it is giving meaning in particular cases to what the legislature has enacted as law; it is saying what the law is.
Morgan v. ABC MANUFACTURER 710 So. 2d 1077 La. 1998
Purcell v. Purcell 697 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Harvey v. Amoco Production Co. 696 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Major v. Major 671 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Russell v. Smith 671 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Albert v. Albert 625 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Harvey v. Amoco Production Co. 620 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Smith 609 So. 2d 809 La. 1992
Lavespere v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, Inc., 910 F.2d 167 , 183 n. 83, reh'g denied, 920 F.2d 259 (5th Cir.1990) (-83 (La.1985)); see also Beary v. City of Rye, 44 N.Y.2d 398 , 406 N.Y.S.2d 9 , 12-13, 377 N.E.2d 453 , 457 (1978).
Reeves v. Reeves 607 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
The party asserting the separate nature of the property acquired during the marriage has the burden of overcoming a strong presumption in favor of the community.
Succession of Dove 597 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Hinckley v. Hinckley 583 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Mailhes v. Mailhes 579 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Luffey v. Luffey 572 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Dance v. Dance 552 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Bernardi v. Bernardi 551 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Burford v. Burford 541 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Allen v. Allen 539 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Camel v. Waller 526 So. 2d 1086 La. 1988
Guarisco v. Guarisco 526 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
It is well established that as a general rule, a law can prescribe only for the future, Louisiana Civil Code Article 8; and cannot be applied retroactively so as to impair obligations or divest or impair vested rights.
Guarisco v. Guarisco 526 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
It is well established that as a general rule, a law can prescribe only for the future, Louisiana Civil Code Article 8; and cannot be applied retroactively so as to impair obligations or divest or impair vested rights.
Burrell v. Burrell 518 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Crawford v. Midwest Steel Co., Inc. 517 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
La.Civ.Code art. 1 (1870).
Succession of Erbelding 509 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Babin v. Saturn Engineering Corp. 501 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Levraea v. Franchina 499 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Succession of Davis 496 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Gulf Federal Savings Bank v. Zoblotsky 496 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Werner v. Department of Police 487 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
In discussing the issue of the retroactive application of laws, the Louisiana Supreme Court, at 282 (La., 1985) stated: As a general rule in Louisiana, a law can proscribe only for the future.
Lambert v. Lambert 480 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Matter of Succession of Lindsey 477 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Cahn v. Cahn 468 So. 2d 1176 La. 1985
Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Anzelmo, 222 La.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by