Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Oller v. Sharp Electric, Inc., 457 So. 2d 1194.

94 citing documents.

Allen Varnado v. 201 St. Charles Place, LLC, Howe Green, Ltd., and Ff Systems, Inc. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
2d Cir.), writ denied, (noting that “[s]ummary judgment may not be used as a substitute for trial”).
Edgefield v. Audubon Nature Inst., Inc. 267 So. 3d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
2d Cir.), writ denied , (noting that "[s]ummary judgment may not be used as a substitute for trial").
Annique Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
2 Cir.), writ denied, Mayfield v. Cas.
Mackmer v. Estate of Angelle 155 So. 3d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2d Cir.), writ denied, (noting that “[sjummary judgment may not be used as a substitute for trial”).
Robert Chastant v. Laura Futral Chastant La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
2d Cir.), writ denied, (noting that “[s]ummary judgment may not be used as a substitute for trial”).
Chastant v. Chastant 138 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2d Cir.), writ denied (La.
Southpark Community Hospital, LLC v. Southpark Acquisition Company,llc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
2d Cir.), writ denied, (noting that “[s]ummary judgment may not be used as a substitute for trial”).
Cypress Bend Investments, LLC v. Louisiana First Financial Group, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
2d Cir.),writ denied, (noting that “[s]ummary judgment may not be used as a substitute for trial”).
Cypress Bend Investments, L.L.C. v. Louisiana First Financial Group, Inc. 105 So. 3d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
2d Cir.), writ denied, (noting that “[sjummary judgment may not be used as a substitute for trial”).
Nelwin Rider v. Jack Stansberry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
2d Cir.),writ denied, (noting that “[s]ummary judgment may not be used as a substitute for trial”).
Rider v. Stansberry 87 So. 3d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
2d Cir.), writ denied, (noting that “[sjummary judgment may not be used as a substitute for trial”).
Brandon Jagneaux v. Ronald R. Frohn La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
2d Cir.), writ denied, (noting that “[s]ummary judgment may not be used as a substitute for trial”).
Jagneaux v. Frohn 74 So. 3d 309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
2d Cir.), writ denied, (noting that “[sjummary judgment may not be used as a substitute for trial”).
Robbie Payne v. Brett Gardner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
2d Cir.),writ denied, (noting that “[s]ummary judgment may not be used as a substitute for trial”).
Robbie Payne v. Brett Gardner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
2d Cir.),writ denied, (noting that “[s]ummary judgment may not be used as a substitute for trial”).
Payne v. Gardner 49 So. 3d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
2d Cir.), writ denied, (noting that “[sjummary judgment may not be used as a substitute for trial”).
Angie Hebert v. Clarendon American Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
2 Cir.), writ denied, Mayfield v. Cas.
Hebert v. CLARENDON AMERICAN INS. CO. 984 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
2 Cir.), writ denied, Mayfield v. Cas.
Istre v. Meche 931 So. 2d 361 La. 2006
2d Cir.), writ denied, (La.
Independent Fire Ins. Co. v. Sunbeam Corp. 755 So. 2d 226 La. 2000
2 Cir.) (holding that "[s]tatements in affidavits or depositions of the opinion or belief of an expert based on his special training and experience do not meet the requirement of personal knowledge"), writ denied, Barnett v. Staats, 25,357 (La.App.
Simmons v. Berry 748 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Leger v. LOUISIANA MEDICAL MUT. INS. CO. 732 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
2d Cir.), writ denied, (noting that "[s]ummary judgment may not be used as a substitute for trial").
Shoemaker v. CITY OF SHREVEPORT EMERGENCY MED. SERV. 728 So. 2d 1031 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
App. 2d Cir.1984), writ denied, where this court stated that the " portion of an affidavit or deposition not based on personal knowledge should not be considered in deciding a motion for summary judgment."
Banque De Depots v. Bozel Mineracao E Ferroligas 728 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir.), writ denied appeal after remand (La.App.
Harris v. Landry 734 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
2nd Cir.), writ denied, (La.
Harkins v. Gauthe 707 So. 2d 1308 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
2d Cir.), writ denied, (noting that "[s]ummary judgment may not be used as a substitute for trial").
Miceli v. Armstrong World Industries 691 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
App. 2nd Cir.), writ denied
Powers v. Tucker 690 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
3d Cir.1971); McCoy v. Physicians & Surgeons Hospital, Inc., writ denied, (La.App.
Rapp v. City of New Orleans 681 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
4th Cir.), writ denied , appeal after remand , writ denied .
Guillory v. Dr. X 679 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
2 Cir.), writ denied, this circuit held that the opinions of the experts of a medical review panel or of those who have not examined the plaintiff are not based upon "personal knowledge" and, therefore, should be disregarded for the purposes of summary judgment.
Osborne v. Vulcan Foundry, Inc. 675 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
4th Cir. 1984), writ denied
Allain-Lebreton Co. v. Exxon Corp. 694 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Gills v. Brown 672 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
4th Cir.), writ denied , appeal after remand , writ denied .
Held v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 672 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
App. 4th Cir.), writ denied , appeal after remand , writ denied .
Serigne v. Ivker 669 So. 2d 1335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
4th Cir.), writ denied, and may not dispense with a case that is difficult to prove, (La.App.
JW Rombach, Inc. v. Parish of Jefferson 670 So. 2d 1305 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
2d Cir.), writ denied, (noting that `[s]ummary judgment may not be used as a substitute for trial').
Stevens v. Bernard 670 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
2 Cir.), writ denied, McElreath v. Progressive Ins.
Patterson v. Al Copeland Enterprises, Inc. 667 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
4 Cir. 1984), writ denied appeal after remand (La.App.
Jeffers v. Thorpe 673 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
App. 4th Cir.), writ denied appeal after remand (La.App.
Leflore v. Coburn 665 So. 2d 1323 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
4th Cir.), writ denied , appeal after remand , writ denied .
Taylor v. Sider 665 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
4 Cir.1984), writ denied, summary judgment shall be granted if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the mover is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
Bridges v. Carl E. Woodward, Inc. 663 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Taylor v. Oakbourne Country Club 663 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
2d Cir.), writ denied, (noting that "[s]ummary judgment may not be used as a substitute for trial").
Touchet v. Estate of Bass 653 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
4th Cir.), writ denied, appeal *89 after remand, writ denied
S. Cent. Bell Tel. Co. v. Sewerage and Water Bd. 652 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
4th Cir.1984), writ denied a summary judgment shall be granted if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the mover is entitled to *1093 judgment as a matter of law.
Evans v. Automotive Cas. Ins. Co. 643 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
2d Cir.), writ denied, (noting that "[s]ummary judgment may not be used as a substitute for trial").
Smith v. OUR LADY OF LAKE HOSP. 639 So. 2d 730 La. 1994
2d Cir.), writ denied, (La.
Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc. 639 So. 2d 730 La. 1994
2d Cir.), writ denied, (noting that “[s]ummary judgment may not be used as a substitute for trial”).
Davidson v. Pan American Life Insurance Co. 637 So. 2d 1276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
4 Cir.1984), writ denied
Polk v. Blanque 633 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
4th Cir.1984), writ denied (1984).