Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jones v. Jones, 462 So. 2d 649.
-
Day v. Day
858 So. 2d 483
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
5th Cir.1984), writ denied, as follows: The record supports our conclusion that the agreement states a bargained-for arrangement advantageous to both parties.
-
Aufrichtig v. Aufrichtig
796 So. 2d 57
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
5th Cir.1984), writ denied, (La.App.
-
Taylor v. Taylor
772 So. 2d 891
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
5th Cir.1984), writ denied
-
Williams v. Williams
760 So. 2d 469
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
5 Cir.), writ denied, (La.App.
- Boudreaux v. Boudreaux 745 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
-
McAlpine v. McAlpine
679 So. 2d 85
La. 1996
App. 5th Cir.1984), writ denied, (post-separation waiver of permanent alimony valid); (La.App.
-
Ellefson v. Ellefson
616 So. 2d 221
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
5th Cir.1984), writ denied it held enforceable a consent agreement whereby the husband agreed to pay a set amount of alimony until the wife's remarriage and she renounced her right to seek an increase for any reason whatsoever, including illness, loss of income, and/or inflation.
-
Stream v. Stream
614 So. 2d 138
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
5th Cir.1984), writ denied, (La.App.
-
Kirby v. Kirby
579 So. 2d 508
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
App. 5th Cir.1984), writ denied, (La.App.
-
Johnson Bros. Corp. v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development
556 So. 2d 154
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Articles 2056, 2057; Kenner *157 (5th Cir.1984) writ denied
-
Coffey v. Coffey
554 So. 2d 202
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
5th Cir.1984), writ denied, (La.App.
-
Myers v. Myers
532 So. 2d 490
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
5th Cir.1984), writ denied, as follows: The record supports our conclusion that the agreement states a bargained-for arrangement advantageous to both parties.
-
Favret v. Favret
527 So. 2d 463
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
5th Cir.1984), writ denied affirmed the enforceability of a community property compromise in which the husband promised to pay a set monthly sum until the wife remarried and the wife agreed not to seek an increase under any circumstances, which agreement the court termed "a bargained-for arrangement advantageous to *465 both parties."
-
Oberfell v. Oberfell
516 So. 2d 424
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
5th Cir.1984), writ denied, (La.
-
Tschirn v. Tschirn
504 So. 2d 1110
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
5th Cir.1984), writ denied, (La.App.
-
Bonck v. Bonck
500 So. 2d 798
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
5th Cir.1984), writ denied, as follows: The record supports our conclusion that the agreement states a bargainedfor arrangement advantageous to both parties.